[blackhole]

I broke the compiler.

[attachment deleted by ninja]

[Hippo]

GET IN THE CAR STAN

[haloboy100]

Careful now. You'll start a resonance cascade with that kind of foolishness.

[colecampbell666]

GET IN THE CAR SPAM

Fix0red.

And you didn't break the compiler, you used Vista.

[haloboy100]

Which broke the computer from the start.

[blackhole]

And you didn't break the compiler, you used Vista.

*stab*

[haloboy100]

Moral:
Blackhole really likes vista.

[Hippo]

Moral: You're still as annoying as ever.

[haloboy100]

Awww....

[colecampbell666]

Don't mind Hippo, he seems to be an angry old fat well... Hippo.

[BloodEagle]

Don't mind Hippo, he seems to be an angry old fat well... Hippo.

Hippos are dangerous animals, and I agree with him regardless of that.

[NGTM-1R]

GET IN THE CAR STAN

WE DIDN'T LISTEN

[Hellstryker]

I broke the compiler.

Let me guess, you divided by 0? 

[haloboy100]

Is that an in joke or something?

Still funny from what i know about /b/

[Snail]

Let me guess, you divided by 0? 

NAN.

[blackhole]

Actually what happened was that I compiled the program, tested it, changed something, got a compiler error, fixed the error and on a whim decided to rip out the particle.def file (and forgot to remove the reference to it), then compiled the program again.

Because half the program had already been compiled with a particle.def file being referenced, when I went to compile the program again the linker looked for particle.def, couldn't find it, and apparently died because it was so confused instead of telling me that it couldn't find particle.def

Let me guess, you divided by 0? 

NAN.

That only works on doubles

[BloodEagle]

Let me guess, you divided by 0? 

Is that an in joke or something?

....

It's impossible to divide something by zero, as zero does not exist.

[Flipside]

Comments like 'zero does not exist' have been the source of much beard-pulling and teeth-gnashing in the mathematical fraternity

It's better to say that zero is a construct, it does exist, but only in the absence of anything normal, and therefore it doesn't obey the same rules

[BloodEagle]

Comments like 'zero does not exist' have been the source of much beard-pulling and teeth-gnashing in the mathematical fraternity

It's better to say that zero is a construct, it does exist, but only in the absence of anything normal, and therefore it doesn't obey the same rules

I disagree. Zero is the absence of anything, and (in my own world) nothing cannot exist.

[haloboy100]

So your saying it's impossible to have 0 apples in a basket?