[Mars]

This is pretty weird: "Under the bill if someone is arrested for viewing children in a public place, it would be a Class D felony..."

I know what they're trying for. I'm just really hoping it doesn't get passed

http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080406/NEWS/804060343/-1/rss56

Those who peer at children in public could find themselves on the wrong side of the law in Maine soon.
A bill that passed the House last month aims to strengthen the crime of visual sexual aggression against children, according to state Rep. Dawn Hill, D-York.
Her involvement started when Ogunquit Police Lt. David Alexander was called to a local beach to deal with a man who appeared to be observing children entering the community bathrooms. Because the state statute prevents arrests for visual sexual aggression of a child in a public place, Alexander said he and his fellow officer could only ask the man to move along.
"There was no violation of law that we could enforce. There was nothing we could charge him with," Alexander said.
He attended a talk with Hill a week later and brought the case to her attention. Hill pledged to do what she could, Alexander said, and the result was a change through the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee in the House, which made the law applicable in both private and public places.
Alexander said he's grateful Hill was willing to take up the cause, and is hopeful the measure will clear the Senate.
"I'll be pleased that we were able to identify this flaw and take steps to rectify it," he said.
Under the bill, if someone is arrested for viewing children in a public place, it would be a Class D felony if the child is between 12 to 14 years old and a Class C felony if the child is under 12, according to Alexander.
Hill said she believes the move was necessary to correct what she called a "loophole" in the state's criminal law statutes.
"I told Lt. Alexander that I would be happy to work with him and sponsor a bill that would correct this in the 2008 session," Hill said. "And so we did."
In arguing for the bill, Alexander said she cited public rest rooms as places where the people using them should have a reasonable expectation of privacy. She said the committee determined that there would not be any major side effects from expanding the statute to include public places.
The bill recently cleared a fiscal review, done because of the state's major prison budget crunch, and Hill said it should be heading to the Senate before long.
York Police Chief Doug Bracy said the statute would represent a fairly minor change that would help keep the public safer, especially children. He noted that York police respond fairly regularly to reports of public peepers on the town's beaches.
With ever-growing concern over sexual predators, Bracy said the arrests will also allow police to check backgrounds and determine if there is a criminal history involved.
"There is a growing outcry by the public to protect our children," Bracy said, noting that tourists from all over the country visit York.

[Kosh]

visual sexual aggression

[Mars]

Mommy, Johnny is looking at me

[Kosh]

No no, this is staring:

 

[Nuclear1]

This is stupid.

[Excalibur]

Police officer sees you looking at the dunnies for 1 sec. before you decide to defecate in there - "SIR, you're under arrest for visual sexual aggression!"

Note how you are thtill called "thir" even if you're the world'th wortht and cwappietht cwiminawl.

[Ashrak]

they should completely outloaw sex in the USA, so the rest of the world dosent have to suffer

[achtung]

I think this is the second time I've seen you pull some America-bash trolling.

What's so far up your ass?

[redsniper]

He's not bashing America as a whole, but rather the prudish Americans who get legislation like this passed, which ultimately results in wrongful accusations and arrests and lives being ruined all to "protect the children!" But of course you can't actually say that. Because, of course, if you oppose something like this, you must be a pedophile, right? Or a terrorist, or a communist, or a witch, etc.

[achtung]

No, it really looks like he's saying "don't let them reproduce anymore."  =/

[MP-Ryan]

There are such things as good laws that are constructed poorly.  This is a candidate.

The problem is not so much the law itself - police officers could pretty clearly use discretion - but the potential for abuse.  Without clauses bringing intent into the picture, its a law that could pretty easily be used to wrongfully arrest someone were a tip phoned in.

This sort of thing is better addressed by bylaws which deal with loitering, etc.

[Kosh]

No, it really looks like he's saying "don't let them reproduce anymore."  =/

If he's saying that I'll second it.

[achtung]

No, it really looks like he's saying "don't let them reproduce anymore."  =/

If he's saying that I'll second it.

I might just agree... to a point. 

[Nuke]

just give all the kids dartguns, that should keep them pervs from watching them.

[BloodEagle]

Let me see if I understand this correctly. They're saying that anyone that watches anyone who is in a public place and is between the ages of 12 and 14 can be considered a felon!?

Wow, puberty is going to seriously suck over there.

[Woolie Wool]

No, it really looks like he's saying "don't let them reproduce anymore."  =/

If he's saying that I'll second it.

I might just agree... to a point. 

How about we ban all Baptists south of 40 degrees latitude from having sex or reproducing?

[Retsof]

No, it really looks like he's saying "don't let them reproduce anymore."  =/

If he's saying that I'll second it.

I might just agree... to a point. 

Hey now! ... Oh, wait ... I hate kids anyway. 

[achtung]

How about we ban all Baptists south of 40 degrees latitude from having sex or reproducing?

Getting warmer.

[Nuke]

lets just nuke the earth, cant get warmer than that

[Mefustae]

Nuke, you so crazy!