Author Topic: Old Mantis Issues  (Read 1261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Some of you may have got an email from Mantis recently along the lines of 'closing - old'
If you have, please have a look at the bug and either reopen, or leave it closed.

Anything older than 6 months that is still open in any way is getting looked at.

There have been a lot of changes in the last 6 months, and a lot of bugs may no longer be relevant, please retest before reopening. Please!

This will help keep everybody on track with Mantis!

Apologies if any toes are being trodden on.  :nervous:

EDIT: On suggestion from Mr Gorrath:
STRONGTEA. Why can't the x86 be sane?

 

Offline FUBAR-BDHR

  • Self-Propelled Trouble Magnet
  • 212
  • Master Drunk
    • 165th Beer Drinking Hell Raisers
I just looked at my open report list and all those are still issues or really need tested thoroughly before closing.  1866 isn't really my report and I have no info on that one.   1890 doesn't need to be private anymore.  That was from before we publicly announced work on Zathras in TBP.
No-one ever listens to Zathras. Quite mad, they say. It is good that Zathras does not mind. He's even grown to like it. Oh yes. -Zathras

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • Moderator
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
Wait, did you actually go through and mass-close a bunch of old bugs?  That's a no-no, methinks.

 
Closed:
1808 (Segfault during mission - no-one able to reproduce, and 8 months old)
930 (3.5 year old Assertion in demo campaign)
1846 (case-sensitive error on mac - resolved by chief)

Feedback:
1632 (ambient music doesn't return after fighters warp out)
1022 (game speed issues under linux 3 years ago)
1326 (has duplicate 1514 - resolved)
1933 (I've provided a solution)
1151 (taylor provided a sample build and didn't receive any feedback)
1927 (related to the OpenAL issue that chief posted on)

Bumped:
82 (repeat-count sexp)

No mass closing. I've read each bug before doing anything to it.
STRONGTEA. Why can't the x86 be sane?