Firstly it's his defence that he didn't know. He's the one saying that not me. I even quoted it above. So if he did ask he needs to be fired for lying or sack his lawyer for make his defence based on something that should result in him being fired.
I don't care what his defense is. As you pointed out, he DID know because he was told. I saw the phone footage and the dashboard cam that was released.
But he couldn't have known there was a patient in the ambulance before he pulled it over and if the patient was in such dire straits (they weren't) the ambulance drivers should have had their lights and sirens on so they wouldn't get pulled over.
Of course not. I'm not going to waste my time explaining the circumstances under which an ambulance should turn on lights and sirens since you should know them anyway but the fact remains that they had someone on board in need of an ambulance.
Again, I've seen the footage of the supposed incident and he was an ass to pull him over. There's no way that should have resulted in pulling over anyone. Let alone an ambulance.
I saw the footage too, days and days ago when it was released. But now I'm slightly confused. Should he be fired because he pulled someone over that didn't deserve it or because there was a patient in the ambulance?
For the record, I think he should be fired for assaulting the driver, not because he pulled them over.
The patient was not in any serious or grave risk.
To me, the best solution to this would have been to pull the guy over, say "just get out the way when we have lights on or put yours on so we know" and left.