Problem is, it's easy to be casually sexist without even realising it, I posted on the 'Chuck' thread a comment that could, if someone wished to, be taken as offensive, but then you do also have to take into account that, when you get to the very core of the male attitude towards women, you are talking about a very large percentage of thoughts and responses that are completely out of control of the male experiencing them.
Y'See, I find it kind of hard to find comments like that offensive, it's sort of like calling a scientist 'smart' is somehow discriminating against clever people, there's nothing wrong with being sexually attractive, men and women were designed to be physically attracted to each other.
So, yes, I do understand the concerns about the jokes and everything, but I think it is approached in the wrong way, you will never destroy the 'little boy' nature of most men, farting around the campfire will always be funny, and boobs will always be objects of obsession to the male of the species.
I think the important thing here is choice women should be free to choose whether they wish to be with a man who has that kind of attitude, a women should be free to choose her vote based on the policies, not the gender, of the candidate, women should be treated like actually think about things and don't exist purely to be a sex-object.
It's like the 'Typical Men' comment that is often heard in offices across the country, it's a stereotype that will never die, whenever Dave sleeps Tina, the office clerk, whilst being married, the phrase 'Typical Man' will raise it's head at one point or another. Is that really hurting my gender, or is it something we need to look at working around and understanding the irony of, rather than try to bludgeon head on?