[Ace Pace]

"They should just... nuke/level all the... cities."???
you want to nuke me?

I hope hes okey but belive me i'm in danger too.

I agree fried sandwhichs are bad , fried Aces are worse.

[Setekh]

Man, I just had a flick through the papers. It's everywhere... so much violence.

[Ace Pace]

UPDATE: 4 soilders  killed in jennin and 7 wounded. I hope sandwhich isn't among them.

[Reaper]

Originally posted by WMCoolmon

Typical Shivan.

BTW i hope hes ok... even if I don't know him... Well, he is HLP member...

[Grey Wolf]

Originally posted by an0n
They should just give a 5 day warning then nuke/level all the major religious cities. Jerusalem, Bethlehem and all those other piss-poor places. It'd stop all the damn fighting.

So you want 3 BILLION people at your throat? That what you'll get when the world's Christians, Muslims, and Jews are all out to get you for nuking Jerusalem, not to mention Bethlehem. You'd plunge the world into the Crusades again! I'm guessing you'd also destroy Rome and Mecca, which would make even more people angry at you...

[Zeronet]

Not to mention Israel would nuke him back.

[Corsair]

With the nukes they're not supposed to have.

[Zeronet]

A lot of people have nukes they shouldnt have, only a few like Britian are allowed them legally.

[Corsair]

I think there's only five countries that can legally have nukes. the U.S., Britain, China, Russia, and France.

Maybe there's more, anybody think of any?

[CP5670]

I think that's about it, but it doesn't really matter who "should" and "should not" have them; anyone who has the capacity to build them basically is allowed to do so.

[Zeronet]

Ahh, no China arent allowed nukes! No way ever.

[LtNarol]

basically, every developed and developing country has nukes, even some of the un-developed ones do (aka black market).

[JR2000Z]

And you can rest easy that there are about 10,000 nuclear warheads sill in exisence.

[an0n]

China is a permenant member of the UN security council and as such can have as many apocalyptic weapons as it likes.

To date, America has produced over 61,000 nukes of various sizes. God knows how many are still active.

And by nuking all the major religious cities, religios wars for control or destruction of the cities would be ended once and for all. Sure, you'd be literally crucified but military tensions in the middle-east would be lowered drastically (in the grand, long-term scheme of things).

[Zeronet]

No. There is a special law dictating that only Britian, France, Russia and the US are legally allowed to have nukes. oh and nuking the middle-east, would get Pakistan nuking you, India nuking them etc and the world would end as we know it, nukes never solve any problem between humans.

[JR2000Z]

Originally posted by an0n


And by nuking all the major religious cities, religios wars for control or destruction of the cities would be ended once and for all. Sure, you'd be literally crucified but military tensions in the middle-east would be lowered drastically (in the grand, long-term scheme of things).

That wont work. Eventhough the cities would be destoryed, the people's faith in their religion will still remain.

[an0n]

nukes never solve any problem between humans.

Are you suuuuuurrre?

Eventhough the cities would be destoryed, the people's faith in their religion will still remain.

Yeah, stupidity always reigns supreme I suppose.

[Grey Wolf]

Not to mention you'd set off a nuclear winter. Here we go to the cross-country skiing trip in the Amazon basin, wearing radiation suits!

[Kamikaze]

Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
Not to mention you'd set off a nuclear winter. Here we go to the cross-country skiing trip in the Amazon basin, wearing radiation suits!

We'd need more Winter Olympics....

[Setekh]

Originally posted by an0n
...a permenant member of the UN security council and as such can have as many apocalyptic weapons as it likes.

Why does it seem that this makes no sense...