Yep, that and us funding bin Laden against the Soviets.
We reap what we sow. Which is why our
good actions overseas (shutting down the Nazis, helping out tsunami victims) have earned us endless goodwill and gratitude, and done far more for us than our clumsy attempts to turn things our way by force.
Seriously, let me pick that apart a little more:
We face the threat we do today because of our own meddling in the past.
I'm gonna call bull**** on this.
Funny, you then go on to agree with me.
If this were true, Europe would be a crater and the rest of us would be speaking German.
No? WWII happened because the Allies ****ed up the ending to WWI. We then had to face the consequences, and fortunately we handled them better the second time around: we helped rebuild Germany and Japan and made them our friends.
Everyone has to take responsibility for they're own actions.
Exactly what I'm arguing here: we are facing the consequences of our actions.
It's easy to say, "IT'S ALL THEY'RE FAULT!", when in fact the reason that most of these countries are **** holes is because the populace won't stand up and take responsibility for themselves.
What countries? Aren't all the 'freedom fighters' and rebels and terrorists standing up and taking responsibility for what happens to them?
Oh yeah, they are. They all scream about how they want the US to get the **** out. In fact the big grievance bin Laden always yelled about was the presence of US troops on 'Arab soil'. Trace his lineage back and the whole Islamist movement emerged as a reaction to the European domination of Arab land.
Which is not to say it's right - it's wrong and evil - but it means that we have to understand that acting the same way we did in the past will create further monsters like bin Laden.
IMO, I don't care any more. They want to rape, murder and kill each other over centuries old grieveances between to sultans who got drunk, fine. Just leave me and mine out of it.
They want to rape, murder, and kill YOU over what they see as something YOU did to them very recently. Which is why we end up having to kill them back. We just need to find much better ways to do it - ways that do not repeat the mistakes that created these very monsters in the first place.
Thus why killing 34 innocent people for every 1 bad guy we get is just going to get us more bad guys in the long run. If you read any AARs from Afghanistan you'd know that's how these guys recruit new hajjis.
It's no coincidence that the most successful units in Iraq and Afghanistan are the ones who stopped using heavy firepower to suppress targets and 'went native', working closely with natives they'd befriended. That's what SpecOps units have been doing and it's what almost worked for us in Vietnam too. History pays off, and if you bothered to talk to our soldiers abroad or read what I have to say, you'd know that.
We can't ignore what happens overseas, because if we **** up over there, it comes over here and bites us in the ass.
Not that you'll read or respond to any of this, but whatever.