Author Topic: Feature Request: no double fire  (Read 3151 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DarkShadow-

  • 28
  • Machina Terra
Feature Request: no double fire
Once I saw the upcoming "no primary linking"-flag, I was wondering if you could add an option (e.g. in ai_profiles) that blocks the double fire mode for secondaries, forcing the player to shoot single missiles. If this already exists somewhere, well, then sorry to disturb you guys.  :)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'" Isaac Asimov

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
On a per weapon basis, or in general?

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
^ yes
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.

You wouldn't have to. It's not something that would be used in the mediavps, only certain mods.

That said, I reckon it ought to be available both as a per-weapon thing and as a global override.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
That would be usefull for universes whre there's simply no such thing like double-fire.
Sometimes, it's just unwanted.

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.

You wouldn't have to. It's not something that would be used in the mediavps, only certain mods.

That said, I reckon it ought to be available both as a per-weapon thing and as a global override.

a weapon flag would be the most flexible way to do it and have the least unintended effect else were
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

  

Offline Tomo

  • 28
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
a weapon flag would be the most flexible way to do it and have the least unintended effect else were
The other usage case is that a particular ship class can't double-fire missiles, but others could.
- Eg a fighter can carry a Big Huge Bang but only fire them one at a time, while a bomber can double-fire them.

So it should be a weapon flag and a ship secondary-bank flag.

However, the weapon flag is more important as a modder can 'fake' the ship-class function by making a TBM copy of an existing weapon.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
while a per weapon flag would be awesome, id do per ship as a dualfire multipler, it would default to 2. if you want to disable dualfire, you set it to 1, if you set it to 4 you fire 4x as many missiles. this would look awesome on bombers with external weapon mountings.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
That's an awsome idea, Nuke.
I can imagine Steve'o's Saracen dumping it's torpedoes in one salvo from it's wing mountings.
I would definitely like this implemented.
Also, it would be great to be able to set it for individual banks.

 

Offline Commander Zane

  • 212
  • Spoot Knight of Anvils
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
*Pictures DoS Saracens quad-salvoing Firestorm Advanced missiles*

ARRRGGHGHH!!!!

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Actually, Firestorm Advanced is already quad-fired, so linking banks won't change anything.

 

Offline Commander Zane

  • 212
  • Spoot Knight of Anvils
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Wouldn't Nuke's ship multiplier idea + swarm missile = assloads more missiles?
I'm seeing the four pylons launching them all at once.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
If you have one missile you can't fire two of them via double fire.
They will run out of torpedoes, so there's no problem.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Wouldn't Nuke's ship multiplier idea + swarm missile = assloads more missiles?
I'm seeing the four pylons launching them all at once.

i would suspect most modders are capable of basic arithmetic, and could determine proper game balance by disallowing certain missiles on certain ships/banks. the idea is mainly for gunships, who carry the same weapons as a normal bomber/assault ship, but can unleash them in bigger numbers. using swarm weapons would fire lots of missiles, yes, but consider that firing all those missiles at one target is a waste of ammo, and should really only be done on a hard target, like a large freighter. that said it might be better to have a per bank multiplier, rather than a global ship multiplier. so i can set one bank to fire mega-barrages, and another bank to work normally. of course you would still want thatper weapon "no dualfire" tag, for those special super-weapons that would be insane to fire in pairs.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2010, 12:35:42 pm by Nuke »
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline DarkShadow-

  • 28
  • Machina Terra
Re: Feature Request: no double fire
That would be usefull for universes whre there's simply no such thing like double-fire.
Sometimes, it's just unwanted.

That's exactly the reason. My mod is not taking part in the FS2-universe. Missiles are more realistic here, they're quite powerful weapons, but fighters can't carry lots of missiles, usually between 4-10. Double-fire just seems weird in this mod.

Btw, it's good to see I'm not the only one wanting this feature, and a lot of your ideas are really nice. :)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, isn't 'Eureka!' but rather 'hmm....that's funny.'" Isaac Asimov