Let me straighten up some things here.
1) My statement that Rian's withdrawal from the thread was "irrational and emotional" did not come out of left field, nor was it "rooted in a stereotypic view of women". It was a direct response to Battuta on IRC, when he asserted that Rian's withdrawal from the thread was "rational and calm". It's disingenuous to make an assertion, and then demand an apology when that assertion is contradicted.
2) The "irrational and emotional" statement was based on specific things Rian said in her
second-to-last post, such as questioning my "authority on which to make this claim", and her
last post, which is textbook ragequitting behavior: fail to address the argument, withdraw from the thread, and leave an insult behind you. Battuta pointed out that one of my assertions (that Rian didn't address the "prefer extinction" opinion) was incorrect, so I conceded that point. However, that does not invalidate the argument as a whole.
3) Battuta claims that my argument "has been thoroughly trashed" based on his demographic calculations from Operation Thresher and the Epsilon Pegasi massacre. While these calculations are useful and illustrative of the casualties suffered in space-based warfare, he neglected to take into account the losses from ground-based warfare. Unfortunately, we have no specific numbers on ground casualties, but we do have plenty of clues. We know that the Harbinger, a warhead with a 5000 megaton payload (300,000 times the yield at Hiroshima), was used for planetary bombardment during the Great War. We also know that the Lucifer's beam cannons "have been seen bombarding colonized worlds". While not as dramatic as the Vasuda Prime bombardment, these undoubtedly caused casualties in the hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions. Finally, Battuta ignores the specific figure of 4 billion lives lost at Vasuda Prime.
4) Neither the HLP website nor the administration is "colored by my opinions"; my professional ability to administrate a website or moderate a forum is independent of whatever personal conclusions I reach on a fictional scenario. Even the fact that I recruited Battuta to be a global moderator is irrelevant; I expect him to think and act for himself. He shouldn't feel any obligation to me personally; any obligation should be to the forum as a whole, or to himself. Indeed, we couldn't even have this public debate if my status as an administrator had a chilling effect on the forum. Few people in the forum share my conclusions anyway.
5) I still fail to understand how any discussion in this thread, or even the opinions people hold in general, should have any effect on Battuta's participation in HLP overall. Battuta, correct me if I'm wrong, but are you really saying that you are incapable of working with people who hold opinions different from yours? It smells of passive-aggressive behavior to me. Karajorma and I hold substantially different political opinions but we work together all the time. I wish you wouldn't resign your global moderatorship or your participation in Blue Planet; you are an asset to the HLP community.