Edit: Oh, now we're getting to complaints about youtube UI? I didn't even really notice any of those recent UI changes until people were crying wolf over them all over.
Every time they change their website/player, they end up breaking the damned site for twenty million people (seriously, check the forums). I got lucky, this time, and it semi-works half of the time on non-featured videos.

I don't really understand all this crying when something changes.
Way to open an argument with a derogatory statement. I'll bite, though.

Ironically it is often for the better, but people just don't even give it a chance because it's not what they're used to. Bah, at least I try to keep an open mind and evaluate things rationally for what they are. Though in youtube's case, I just don't care much. I don't have much use for ratings or comments so they could just as well not exist.
Define "better." I find needless changes to a user-interface to be hideous at best, and detrimental to the purpose of the program at worst.
Case-in-point: Micro$oft Office's UI change. If you've ever used the previous version, the "new one" makes you want to gouge out your eyes with a makeshift shank.
I've heard that it's more efficient, but failed to see any hard evidence.
Personally, I fail to see how removing
words (e.g., 'edit', 'file', 'format') that
describe the action you want to occur is more efficient, under normal circumstances. [/inane rabbling]
-----------------------------------------------------
@topic: Meh. I don't like it, but it isn't a hindrance.