I'm of the opinion that Asperger's disorder is a diagnosis that shouldn't exist. That is, as far as I can tell (being a layperson who occasionally reads stuff on the Internet), there's no physiological/neural/"real" difference between someone with Asperger's and someone without it. Since it's a diagnosis, either you have it or you don't. Which is rubbish, because it's assigning a yes-or-no value to something that isn't a yes-or-no issue.
Research adds to evidence that autism is a brain 'connectivity' disorder
Learn.
And if you're showing me
that link and telling me to "learn", you obviously didn't get the point. I'm not saying there isn't something different about these people, I'm saying that diagnoses of "autism" and "autism-spectrum disorders" (including Asperger's syndrome) don't say
anything about the cause. That survey you linked to
suggests a slightly more specific explanation of at least one possible cause.... But "Asperger's syndrome" and "autism" are still just
names for different ranges on a scale. They don't describe a single physiological/biological/neural phenomenon, they describe the many possible phenomena which can cause someone to fall within that range on the scale!
Analogous scenario: If someone gets a low score on an IQ test, they're stupid/retarded/whatever (colloquially). They might even be 'retarded'. But that's not an explanation, it's just a label you can slap on things.
And as far as I can tell (being a layperson who occasionally reads stuff on the Internet), it's the same way with Asperger's.
You're not one of us, you wouldn't understand.

I was wondering how long it would take for somebody to come along and interpret that as an attack on people who've been diagnosed with Asperger's. You obviously don't understand the concept of an analogy. And for all you know, I
do have Asperger's syndrome.
I don't even know if I have it or not. And frankly I don't care whether I have it, because it's just a
classification of the severity of the symptoms, and that information is of no use to me.