Author Topic: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers  (Read 15213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MP-Ryan

  • Makes General Discussion Make Sense.
  • Global Moderator
  • 210
  • Keyboard > Pen > Sword
I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
It may well apply to HLP General Discussion =P

http://xkcd.com/810/
"In the beginning, the Universe was created.  This made a lot of people very angry and has widely been regarded as a bad move."  [Douglas Adams]

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
 :yes:
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

 
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
xkcd rocks

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
xkcd sucks

go read nedroid and dresden codak

(that said i actually rather liked that one, it wasn't chart humor or another ONE OF US circlejerk)

 
 
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Quote
It's been clear to me for a while that xkcd is no longer a great webcomic (though it once was)

sad, but true. I wouldn't say it actually sucks though. Whatever, I keep checking it, just in case.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Yeah me too. I don't actually care enough to do more than troll on the subject, but it has definitely gone way downhill from its brief peak.

 

Offline MR_T3D

  • 29
  • Personal Text
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
I look at it and chuckle or smirk, and its simple, so I see no problem with it.

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
While on the other hand, this webcomic illustrates HLP IRC's antics fairly well.

 

Offline Dilmah G

  • Failed juggling
  • 211
  • Do try it.
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Ah, Bearstrikes showed me that one the other day. Coincidentally, half a dozen of us talked about how **** xkcd had gotten as well yesterday.

  
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Ah, Bearstrikes showed me that one the other day. Coincidentally, half a dozen of us talked about how **** xkcd had gotten as well yesterday.

Indeed.  Shame, It was once insightful, now it's just trying too hard.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Pretty much that.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Meh, I've read through the entire archive a few times now, and I still get decent chuckles from the newer strips.  Maybe not quite so many as from a few years ago, but there have been some recent gems too.  That "xkcd sucks" guy needs to find something far more productive to do with his time.

 

Offline Dilmah G

  • Failed juggling
  • 211
  • Do try it.
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
I have to agree with you there. I cannot believe someone would take the time out to write all that just because they don't like the webcomic. :P

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
It's a bunch of people, actually, and there's very little more satisfying than sitting around in a huddle and discussing how tragically good things have gone bad. Witness the endless amusement inherent in discussing hypothetical Matrix sequels!

Or, more personally, nothing in recent history has pleased me more than posting my crushing reviews of Halo Reach over on halo.bungie.org. Ah, the tears, the drama.

 

Offline Dilmah G

  • Failed juggling
  • 211
  • Do try it.
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Yeah, but looking at it in a broader sense, apart from releasing pent up steam and frustration, and perhaps acting as a source of amusement as people take sides, Bungie aren't going to do a re-release of Halo:Reach - The Battuta's Cut because of it. :P Though they may incorporate some of the more productive criticisms in whatever they decide to do next.

Reading your NPC piece now though; there are some good ideas in there.

I digress.

xkcd -> downhill.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
In point of fact Bungie (well, ex-Bungie, now 343) personnel on the forum opened up about content of upcoming novel lines, which was personally illuminating for me.

 
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
Or, more personally, nothing in recent history has pleased me more than posting my crushing reviews of Halo Reach over on halo.bungie.org. Ah, the tears, the drama.

Link?  I want to savor the delicious fanboy tears  :p

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
I have nothing at all against critical reviews of a particular item or work, but going out of one's way to post daily blog updates breaking down why each and every new strip supposedly sucks feels way beyond excessive.  I mean, for ****'s sake, it's a few-panel stick-figure webcomic we're talking about here. :p

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: I had to share this xkcd gem on spammers
A cultural touchstone read by thousands (tens of thousands? hundreds?) as well. Any good art form should have critics; webcomics are no exception.