[Nuclear1]

.........

.........

........

*thinks*
.....
....
...
..
.
.
..
...
....
.....

Yeah!

[deep_eyes]

Originally posted by Ten of Twelve
But still it's too big...I don't belive what I'm sain'

Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
Let's see...[list=1]

• First step, cut off that damn thing! It makes it look like the worst ships since the GTD Dildo!
• Next, make it about three times longer.
• Textures are good to put on ships

Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwooooooooooooooooooooooooo............. downhill thread............................... lol.............it looks to big, looks like a penis, too small, theyg onna joke on who ever pilots the thing and say, "HEY ALPHA 1! U GOT A SMALL ONE DONT CHA'!?!"

all jokes aside.............( ) nice modeling, but do something bout the wang stabalizer lol........ I dont see too many elephants getting balance from there PARA 50 CALIBER MACHINE GUN.........:devilidea

[Raven2001]

1. The few ppl that liked it, and didn't say any stupidity about it, made me stay with this design, so...... it will stay like this, because, with textures it will look great.
2. No, the goddamn penis never came to mind, so:
           2.1. I don't know what a penis is...
           2.2. Most of you have lack of sex, or don't know what that is...
- I choose 2.2.

PERIOD

[YodaSean]

The design is OK, but I think it would look a little better(please don't quote me on this ) if the thing sticking off the back looked a little more attached to the ship, because right now it looks sort of like it would fall off...

Oh yeah and it would be really hard to strafe a capital ship and avoid having that thing collide with it

[Stryke 9]

A ship featuring the friendly weapon. Nice. Freudian.

No, I don't think it's ENTIRELY that obvious, but I get the sense that even if it were skinned well something subconscious would make me cringe every time it got shot in a dogfight...

I don't particularly like it anyway, so there goes your first argument. There's no reason for that lower... appendage to be there, it's way too big and chunky to serva any purpose, and it's ugly as all hell. And without it, that ship's a slightly modified Loki from the front and even less inspiring from the side- pointy little semiellipses?

[Nico]

a loki... have you played FS2 recently?

[Stryke 9]

No, but I've played with the models plenty. From the front, it resembles a Loki carrying a sack of **** more than anything else.

[Sheepy]

I think if you kinda "pinched" the strut abit at its top so it became fatter but also a lil thiner (from the side) it might stop the youngens moaning abit.

To be perfectly honest mate i didnt think anything of it untill some one pointed it out, then it was like yeah i suppose it does abit, anyways im rambling now.


Keep it or leave it, at the end of the days its your choice mate.

[Stryke 9]

I think it emphatically is.

Of course, it should have warned the first crowd off when he asked for opinions that he didn't really want them.

[Nico]

Originally posted by Stryke 9
I think it emphatically is.

Of course, it should have warned the first crowd off when he asked for opinions that he didn't really want them.

well, he was asking for opinion, not the "oh look! a dick!" childish behaviour...

[Admiral LSD]

Originally posted by venom2506
well, he was asking for opinion, not the "oh look! a dick!" childish behaviour...

It may have been childish but what kind of dumbarse designs a ship with such an obvious extension and doesn't expect such childish behaviour? If he didn't want the outcry he should have been more conservative in his design.

[Ryx]

Originally posted by Admiral LSD


It may have been childish but what kind of dumbarse designs a ship with such an obvious extension and doesn't expect such childish behaviour? If he didn't want the outcry he should have been more conservative in his design.

Because it wasn't obvious. If you've put effort into a model and you're happy with the way it turned out, You won't make that connection.
I fixed the symmetry for this ship and I didn't see it.

Perhaps you think about it when you model, but I know I don't when I model a new ship.

fun comment, for sure, but know it's wearing(sp?) thin.

[Fozzy]

Dark made some model with a sexual organ, but his maps made it look cool

[Ryx]

Dang, those are good.

[Nico]

Originally posted by Fozzy
Dark made some model with a sexual organ, but his maps made it look cool

ok:
YOU STUPID!!!

in case you didnt' notice, those ships are MAPPED .
what did I keep repeating all along this thread? bah, go play back in your sandbox

[karajorma]

Originally posted by venom2506


ok:
YOU STUPID!!!

in case you didnt' notice, those ships are MAPPED .
what did I keep repeating all along this thread? bah, go play back in your sandbox

Ummm. I think he's making the same point you did!

Anyway even if the strut didn`t look like a giant dick most of us would be suggesting cutting it off. It looks bolted on. Furthermore it looks bolted on for no good reason! What is it there for?

 If the strut had looked like something less comical most people would have quite happily suggested removing or shrinking it since to a lot of us it just looks wrong.

[Nico]

ah? oups, my bad, misread
anyway, I like it the way it is, can be, dunno, a gravity well or something like that.

[YodaSean]

Why can't the "strut" just be replaced with a really large, razor thin wing?  That would look a lot better

[Killfrenzy]

Yeah, make it thinner - it looks awful at that thickness.

When I make wings, I insist on making it as thin as possible.

[Stryke 9]

As a rule, it's best to have some kind of practical application in mind when designing ships anyway... saying "Oh, this looks cool" and sticking random crap on may produce a result that looks good to you, but to anyone else they're usually laughable.


Aside from which, ships look cooler if they look like they DO something anyway- would the Stealth Bomber or a Tomcat be aesthetically improved by a pair of big, useless spiky structures on the wings, or a giant lump in the back?