Likewise [the Bible] mocks disbelievers, encourages morally bankrupt concepts like Jesus forgiving your sins(I'll explain if need will really be).
Please do explain what is morally bankrupt about Jesus forgiving one's sins.
If you rely on Jesus to forgive you wronging people, you are reduced to the level of the child who kicks someone and then hides behind its parents who have to take the heat for its misconduct. To get a bit closer, the way it works is that you beat up someone, you run home, you tell your parents, and your parents
ALWAYS forgive you. Oddly enough, your parents have no concept of morality themselves. But this doesn't matter to you, because you've idolized them so much that their say is final, and once forgiven you can be on your way. If you happen to run into that person again and apologize, that's just
extra.
So, when Jesus forgives you, it means NOTHING. Jesus was the son of God, and if he can forgive -- which he always can -- you have no reason to make amends with the people that you wronged. If the highest authority in the universe can forgive you, of course bearing in mind that you've already bought into the idea that human-kind is fundamentally evil, what is the point of you apologizing to the person themself? This particular doctrine of Christianity corrupts -- mostly, it doesn't destroy it -- a basic part of being human; being able to take responsibility and make amends.
Now add in the mix that the person who claims to forgive the sins of others is the son of an ethnically-cleaning, mass-murdering, sadistic, racist megalomaniac. Imagine someone like that walking around like that, taking on the responsibility for people's wrongdoings. Not only is it wrong for the reasons above, it's also hurtful that, somehow, this person takes precedence. I don't wanna delve too much into speculation here, but I figure that religious people are more likely to go to Jesus than... you get where I'm going with this, so there.