Dude, your just being a troll.
I've actually engaged with your arguments. I asked for statistics, you gave me statistics, I critiqued them, you ragequit the discussion.
I have, at all times, attempted to discuss the issue on points, to talk about the evidence you are using. You have, at all times, reacted out of anger and admit as much with every post where you lapse into angry gibberish or claim you're resisting the urge to flame or actually do flame.
If you're getting trolled, you're doing it to yourself.
It's a simple as that. There's plenty of evidence and statistics.
Old evidence, bad evidence. If this is a terrible problem today, then I'd like to see evidence from today, or at least the last year. As it stands, it looks like people stopped even being able to track the issue three years ago.
You obviously haven't even gone to look for it yourself.
I have made statements about the statistics offered including date of compilation, pattern of growth, and variance that would only be possible by viewing them. This is a blatant lie.
I don't need to prove anything to you (even though that's the attitude you are taking).
Then why are you in this discussion? Why did you take it up?
I've worked with this organization (iEmpathize). I've talked to girls who were trapped in this life before being rescued. I've talked with Brad Riley who's been to and helped shut down brothels. (By 'talked with' I mean, have' become good friends with' considering there's a highway intersection here in KC that is known for being a very popular child sex trade location. They come to KC often.)
So in so many words you're biased. Also, see the nature of anecdotal evidence vs. useful science.
Scared into it? No... Actually care about someone other than myself? Very much yes.
And **** you too, sir, for pretending I lack empathy. You protest slavery and perhaps even work against it in a peripheral fashion. I donate time to education and often to the poor of Tijuana, building housing. Which of us is engaged in servicing a more basic need?
