Author Topic: The Durga  (Read 31062 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Deadly in a Shadow

  • 29
  • Buntu!
So what's the logical conclution of that chain? "Avoid being hit and you won't get hit pilot"?
"Avoid being slammer'd or redemah'd and you won't get hit pilot."

My logical conclusion:"Avoid being a pilot and you won't get hit."
« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 11:57:26 am by Deadly in a Shadow »
"Ka-BOOOOOOOOM!!!!"
"Uh, Sir we can hear the explosion."
"No you can't, there is no air in space. Sound can't travel through a vacuum!"

 

Offline Destiny

  • 29
  • Twintails are eternal!
I believe that 'Avoid existing and you won't get hit, but even then in heaven or hell you'll still get hit because there is a War in Heaven'. :P

 

Offline Alpha1

  • 25
I Hope i can fly the Durga und the other Fleetbomber in the next Acts of War in Heaven :-) I tested the new weapons and ships in the Singelmission und i think these vessels fit perfectly in the BP Universe.
Not quantity but high quality ships and less advanced, but highly effective weapons.
The fact that the UEF and the GTVA are that different makes the Gameplay interesting and I like to have influence on the battle - even against GTVA Capships - which is possible due to these crafts.


 

Offline Flak

  • 28
  • 123
Yeah, the only thing missing in War in Heaven is some capital ship bombing missions.

 

Offline Darius

  • Moderator
  • 211
Worry not, there will be plenty of "I am heavy weapons guy" coming up.

 

Offline Buckshee Rounds

  • 29
  • Lord Defecator
How come there weren't any in the first release of WiH? Did it have something to do with you guy's adversity to bombers?

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
How come there weren't any in the first release of WiH? Did it have something to do with you guy's adversity to bombers?
Uh, what adversity to bombers?

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
The one we've stated in the commentary, for example. Yes, that did play a role, however, a bigger part in our decision was to make sure you guys understood that the UEF bombers are highly valuable, very rare ressources that are only dragged out in the direst of emergencies.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Which still doesn't make sense to me given that the UEF favors small craft deployments.  Was it just something to make them different from the GTVA, which favors large numbers of reasonably tough, though slow and under armed torpedo delivery vehicles?
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 
Dang, there are so many things here that I want to comment on, but most of them were posted forever ago...

 

Offline -Norbert-

  • 211
Which still doesn't make sense to me given that the UEF favors small craft deployments.  Was it just something to make them different from the GTVA, which favors large numbers of reasonably tough, though slow and under armed torpedo delivery vehicles?
It does make a lot of sense, if you consider the situation.
The UEF was isolated with the Gefs being the only enemy. Since the Gef have no capital ships, bombers and destroyers were not needed and thus became a highly controverse topic. Their building was opposed by many within the UEF and thus only few were build.
And that's why they are so valuable and only brought out in emergencies. While they are highly effective, they simply have too few of them for widespread deployment.
Furthermore with the UEF ships being more maintanance intensive than their GTVA counterparts, I think each individual ship will spend more time in the workship thus further limiting the number of currently usable bombers (that last sentence is pure speculation on my part - except the high maintanance part, that's BP canon - but it would be a logical conclusion from the facts provided by the background story and the BP team).

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Then there's the thing that UEF bombers generally pack a lot more firepower (because of their heavy primary armaments), and are thus a higher risk to GTVA capital ships. As a result, the GTVA has deployed hunter-killer fighter groups that are dispatched whenever these bombers show (What did you think popup Trebuchet strikes are for?), making their deployment a risky gamble. Unlike the GTVA, the UEF simply can't afford to deploy manned bombers in large numbers and soak up the losses.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Timerlane

  • 27
  • Overseer of Slag Determination
I imagine the far more plentiful(pre-GTVA incursion) Uriels would have been more than sufficient to handle the bomber/assault duties within the Sol system, with all those primaries, and room for eight Slammers plus a pair of Jackhammers, if bombs were ever really needed.

 

Offline Commander Zane

  • 212
  • Spoot Knight of Anvils
They're not plentiful, read its tech description. Losing too many of them to Trebuchet strikes forced the UEF to use the Uriel on special occasions only as well.

 

Offline Timerlane

  • 27
  • Overseer of Slag Determination
That's why I said "pre-GTVA incursion". They simply didn't have a need for lots of apocalyptic super-bombers until the GTVA showed up.

 

Offline Flak

  • 28
  • 123
At least we haven't seen the new fighters and bombers yet, probably Byrne kept them in hiding until the right moment.

 

Offline Drogoth

  • 28
At least we haven't seen the new fighters and bombers yet, probably Byrne kept them in hiding until the right moment.

Probably Byrne kept them hiding until it was to late*

Long live the Tevs!

In all seriousness though, it better be to late :/
TC 2 Fan club for Life

 

Offline Ravenholme

  • 29
  • (d.h.f)
At least we haven't seen the new fighters and bombers yet, probably Byrne kept them in hiding until the right moment.

Probably Byrne kept them hiding until it was to late*

Long live the Tevs!

In all seriousness though, it better be to late :/

The Tev love in the BP forums warms my heart - I love my morally questionable Tevs, if only because they've endured so much and deserve to win, imo.
Full Auto - I've got a bullet here with your name on it, and I'm going to keep firing until I find out which one it is.

<The_E>   Several sex-based solutions come to mind
<The_E>   Errr
<The_E>   *sexp

 

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Tev lovers are the louder ones.

Because they know in their heart that they're wrong, but won't admit it.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Tev lovers are the louder ones.

Because they know in their heart that they're wrong, but won't admit it.

To paraphrase the military maxim: "If I'm more confident in my wrong answer than you are in your right one, I'm right."