i dont like chrome because its too dependent on drive caching. needless to say i have a laptop in my room which has the sole purpose of watching porn on the internet (granted i also use it to terminal into my workstation downstairs). this machine is a peice of ****, it boots a stripped down xp off of a 16gb compact flash card, giving it horrifically slow file read/write access. on top of that it has serious power issues, issues that cause the computer to shut down at random. needless to say while chrome reports file error after fire error, because of the random shutdowns, firefox does not even seem to notice them. firefox is a little more stable, but slightly less responsive than chrome is after a chkdisk run. if chrome happens to be running durring a power down, then next time it runs chrome will act like a doped up retard with a concussion. firefox after the same kind of power failure, will just chug along as if nothing happened. the only reason i use chrome on that system is because of its perceived minimalist design. if it reduces its memory footprint by whoring up drive space, then its merely hiding its memory usage in the much slower hd cache.