The problem is that that party would be even more divided then the ones who concentrate around one leader, who subsequently gets shot.
I don't know, I think things like internet freedom, transparency, etc, would maintain a pretty cohesive unit. I think it would be fine to have a party that was fractured and disagreed, as long as they agree on a few fundamental concepts, rather than just rallying behind a particular person to carry their banner. As for those concepts, , I'd say most everyone on the net thinks the net should be open and government should be more transparent, not less.
A big one, though, would be accountability, so long as people stuck to the principle and didn't try to skirt around it.