Nuclear runs out.
Subtle adhomimem strawman diversion with a side of cherrypicking. That's not the point, Joshua.
I've heard that in australia 18+year old small breasted woman porn is censored, not sure if true. But age means nothing if biological age matches. Theoretically one could even erase memories and rejuvenate the brain. Irregardless synthetic biology replicant like artificial humans, and agis will be young and employed in the sex industry.
cp laws are ridiculous, the laws border on thought crime police. We know that video or photographic evidence of torture, theft, assassinations, etc. are legal to possess and distribute. Separating one type of crime solely when involving a certain class of citizens as special and taboo, is ridiculous. The law should be equitable, and all citizens should be equal before the law. If it is legal to possess images and videos of far worse crimes inflicted on the same citizens, the puritan antinudity reasoning is simply not enough, not enough to justify the laws or the penalties involved.
In any case the veracity of certain individuals existing or not, is not the point. It is the supernatural claims that demand evidence. Neo-nazis can spruce of Hitler as a divine being and ascribe all sort of miracles to him, even if everything lines up historically, their supernatural claims would rest on nothing but thin air.
With regards to nazis, that was based on speculation, genetically engineered superhumans are based on real measurements. If the creativity and intellect far exceed the common man, than those who're superior should be the leaders.
How many false prophets and evidently false religions have not sprung up? And withstood the test of time. (E.g Scientology)
A Christian will carry out works of goodness and kindness that God requires. In Islam, a person has to carry out a set of prescribed rules and then Allah may accept such a person. The only guaranteed way, Allah will be totally pleased to definitely accept someone is if that person had become a martyr for the Islamic faith.
A few dozen virgins in the afterlife, iirc. What a paltry gift, maybe something to marvel at for primitive men. But this world allows those in power to have a thousand fold as many virgins, and eventually even immortality.
A terrorist filming a beheading and distributing it, and those other news agency further distributing it, is perfectly legal, even if it involved a child. Horrible crime, horrible message, perfectly legal.
I cannot stand that an individual would be incarcerated for possessing mere photos, these are not nuclear codes, or things of national security, wherein information is a threat to national security. These are mere images or videos, how can the liberty of an individual be removed because of something that can easily be planted as evidence by almost anyone with a mere pen drive on a hidden folder.
Even through mere net access, it can be planted by a hacker. If your computer is unknowingly hacked it could be used to host and distribute such content without your consent or knowledge.
Besides that there are countries where we do not interfere and where the age of consent is low enough that child pornography need not involve criminal activity in the countries wherein it is created. Either we interfere and force our age of consent laws, or if we're going to allow such to go on somewhere else in the world, the recordings of such legal couples sexual activities should not involve prosecution upon entering U.S. soil... we know people like the pope can't be touched, and neither can someone with the backings of a nuclear state.
I should also add that if a couple of twelve year old teens engage and record their sexual activity, they should be free to distribute and charge for it, assuming no third coercing party is involved of course.
until you're 20
I'm 34. Want to hear some stories?