Author Topic: Star Wars: Episode 7  (Read 29939 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
"I have a bad feeling about this!" as quoted from all previous six movies, I wonder if they'll keep that line in the new movies.

I wonder how well a Battlestar Galactica-esque reboot of Star Wars would be received.

Or how about a Star Trek esque reboot!  :p
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
Captain Kirk makes a terrible discovery....

.... a black hole that connects to a different galaxy....


.... in a time where the very forces of the universe are changed


.... Now, a terrible empire in the brink of destruction threatens a Federation paradise....


... unless a 25 year old prick intervenes.


... This is...

... STAR TREK WARS



Dat was pretty bad. Reminds me why I'll never be a writer.

 

Offline LordMelvin

  • emacs ftw
  • 28
  • VI OR DEATH! DOWN WITH EMACS!
... I wonder if they'll keep that line in the new movies.
...

Of course they will. If there's one thing the soulless grasping maw that is the Mouse has always shown, it's the ability to take IPs and subcontract them to the entity who produces the most entertaining - and therefore profitable - ending film. In the case of their Marvel acquisition, that resulted in Whedon's Avengers. In the case of the Holy Trilogy, we'll have to wait and see precisely what they produce, but they'll certainly be competent enough to hit the basic fanboy buttons. So of course someone will have "a bad feeling" about something. That's just too low a bar to set, much like asking if a Star Trek movie will have a ship called "Enterprise" in it, or if a Tolkien movie will include Elves.


And yes, I know that there's been a Trek film where they didn't fly the Enterprise.
Error: ls.rnd.sig.txt not found

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
There isn't any ST film where they do not fly the Enterprise.

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
You haven't seen ST 4 then, I take it.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
You haven't seen ST 4 then, I take it.

They fly the enterprise in ST Whales Edition. Check the final minute of the movie (gotcha!) :p

  

Offline newman

  • 211
Seeing the Enterprise at the last minute of the movie isn't quite the same as flying it.
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here! - Jayne Cobb

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
This is getting too much off topic. I was just setting a trap and The_E fell for it... and yes, they *do* fly the Enterprise in the last minute of ST IV, although the majority of the movie is set on the Bounty.

 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
This is getting too much off topic. I was just setting a trap and The_E fell for it... and yes, they *do* fly the Enterprise in the last minute of ST IV, although the majority of the movie is set on the Bounty.


Errrrr.......no! They "fly" (if that is what you want to call it) a Klingon Vessell which I don't think is called the Bounty.
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 
 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
Okay so the crew re-named the Bird of Prey, but that wasn't it's original name.
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
You still arguing? Come on don't be silly.

 

Offline Nohiki

  • 28
  • Graf von Kaffeetrinken
    • Steam
Am i the only one who thinks this is gonna suck not because of disney but because 1 - 6 sucked as well? xD I can live with 4-6, because they were somehting new when they aired, but the rest... meh

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Apparently Lucas will remain on as 'creative consultant', which is kind of like having Pol Pot in charge of human resources, so my expectations are dropping.

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
Any job description that has "consultant" in it actually means "He's gone from this company/project/whatever". It's an euphemism for "out!".

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
This is getting too much off topic. I was just setting a trap and The_E fell for it...

And I'm going to warn you for trolling. See you tomorrow.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Another aspect that concerns me: Disney's approach to copyright. Lucas was pretty good about letting fan works thrive. Disney is notorious for the opposite.

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Another aspect that concerns me: Disney's approach to copyright. Lucas was pretty good about letting fan works thrive. Disney is notorious for the opposite.

This is a good point, Disney are notorious for shutting down derivative works, and this could put a lot of Mods/Fansites and Amateur movie-makers in a very difficult situation if they go their usual 'bull in a Chinashop' approach. Though why a company like Disney would choose such a cannibalistic path has always confused me quite a bit.

 

Offline deathfun

  • 210
  • Hey man. Peace. *Car hits them* Frakking hippies
Another aspect that concerns me: Disney's approach to copyright. Lucas was pretty good about letting fan works thrive. Disney is notorious for the opposite.

This is a good point, Disney are notorious for shutting down derivative works, and this could put a lot of Mods/Fansites and Amateur movie-makers in a very difficult situation if they go their usual 'bull in a Chinashop' approach. Though why a company like Disney would choose such a cannibalistic path has always confused me quite a bit.

If they touch the Star Wars FreeSpace mod, I'll will assist Nuke in the detonation process of his nuclear arsenal
"No"

 

Offline FlamingCobra

  • An Experiment In Weaponised Annoyance
  • 28
Another aspect that concerns me: Disney's approach to copyright. Lucas was pretty good about letting fan works thrive. Disney is notorious for the opposite.

This is a good point, Disney are notorious for shutting down derivative works, and this could put a lot of Mods/Fansites and Amateur movie-makers in a very difficult situation if they go their usual 'bull in a Chinashop' approach. Though why a company like Disney would choose such a cannibalistic path has always confused me quite a bit.

If they touch the Star Wars FreeSpace mod, I'll will assist Nuke in the detonation process of his nuclear arsenal
Denial of Service