Author Topic: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)  (Read 3582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline watsisname

Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
For a second I thought you were going to say we should throw comets at it or something. :lol:
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
Amusingly enough, Deep Impact was just playing on TV earlier. :p

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
Uh... if you're planning on towing something so it ends up in orbit around the moon, it's also going to be in orbit around the earth. I don't see how the first is any safer than the second.

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
Uh... if you're planning on towing something so it ends up in orbit around the moon, it's also going to be in orbit around the earth. I don't see how the first is any safer than the second.

Then you probably don't have a very good understanding of orbital mechanics or how far apart the Earth and the Moon are, and should play more KSP to learn.

Or more simply, there's no reason you have to bring it in past the Earth or towards the Earth, or even in a way you could slingshot it into the Earth, so if you blow the orbit and slingshot it off, oops, oh well. If you blow the orbit the other way, it just hits the Moon.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

  

Offline watsisname

Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
Uh... if you're planning on towing something so it ends up in orbit around the moon, it's also going to be in orbit around the earth. I don't see how the first is any safer than the second.

As long as it is placed within the region of stable lunar orbits (which admittedly is not very big -- up to about 1200km for low-inclination circular orbits) then there's no problem.
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Interesting (NASA Asteroid Plan)
From a standpoint of orbital mechanics / energetics, the most efficient way to capture an asteroid in a lunar orbit would be to first have it come very close to Earth, perhaps even aerobraking it in the upper atmosphere (must be very careful to not bring it so low that aerodynamic forces break it apart) and having the outbound trajectory bring it past the Moon, at which point the tug slows it down for lunar capture.

In practice, this is a terrible idea -- one small error and it could intersect Earth with potentially disastrous results.  Instead, depending on how rapidly we can accelerate the asteroid, it would make the most sense to go straight into lunar orbit from the first pass.  I doubt it would be possible to do that with current technology though, since that requires a large change in velocity in a very short span of time.  Instead some trade-off would probably be made with the asteroid first being captured around the Earth at a comfortably large perigee distance, then over subsequent orbits bring it over to the Moon for final orbital insertion.
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.