Good.
Enbridge's emergency response measures are an absolute joke. If it were any other company I might support it, but with Enbridge running the show we are virtually guaranteed that if a spill occurs, it will be absolutely disastrous, as history has shown.
I'm not fundamentally opposed to pipelines, but my work is partially connected to this industry and in general my opinion is that they do not have to put up near the financial bonds they should to ensure money is there for cleanup, and they shortcut available monitoring technologies and preventative measures wherever they can get away with it to reduce costs. The regulation of these pipelines also varies considerably between jurisdictions, and all of these companies tend to use the "but we met our approval conditions!" excuse, even though the approval conditions are the minimum acceptable standard.
Even though the BC decision is 9/10 political pandering and 1/10 actual concern in the making, I still think it's the right call. Especially given the terminal location and the terrain this thing was supposed to pass through. Ugly, ugly areas for an oil spill of any kind.