Ah, ok.

So back on topic; this whole millenials vs. boomers thing could be used as a tool to divide the populace to make them more pliable. I'm not saying it is being used that way, but I am saying that it seems to be having a similar effect in some cases; some people or organizations (looking at
you, New York Times), like to belittle one generation or the other, so rather than coming together to solve the issues, it's more about throwing blame one way or the other.
In doing so, we are kept from tackling the real issues; corporate citizenship, unfair distribution of wealth, etc. Instead boomers are lumped into a "them" and millenials into an "us". In the end it's ultimately self-defeating though, because there are very, very few people that would be willing to put their parents or their children on trial in public, which is what this whole argument boils down to in the end.