If you're insulted you need to explain why I'm wrong, but then your explanation why you support firing squads is factually incorrect. Reread my last post, acknowledge what I said there, and update your explanation. Your stumbling point is the belief that there are no more effective and humane methods of execution. This is odd, since your belief has been corrected by multiple people multiple times in this thread alone.
Your antidemocratic argument was predicated on the belief that people will never mobilize to achieve this end. That's demonstrably wrong. You're moving the goalposts to 'some people will not mobilize to achieve this end', which is a different argument: you're now claiming it's hard, rather than impossible, which torpedoes your entire original claim, that no democratic process could effectively ban the death penalty and that your proposal for a raft of gradual confinement legislation was less drastic. 'Good luck with that', you say, and yet apparently good luck isn't necessary: just political action and process.
Your love of the firing squad and your hatred of democracy are motivated by the same fundamental illusion: a dream that you can replace complexity with simplicity, a simplicity that exists in your own mind but would tarnish and fail when subjected to the ultimate litmus—implementation.
