[Kellan]

Okay, that's a slightly misleading title because nobody has any plans to rebuild the World Trade Center but they do plan to redevelop the site - and the plans have been published.

You can find a rundown and a poll over there --> http://www.guardian.co.uk/gall/0,8542,756838,00.html

Since this is something we have all talked, argued and sympathised over (or at least some of those) I thought y'all might be interested.

[Zeronet]

I dont like those, its sort of giving up by not building something bigger or just as big, almost like letting bin liner win. I want to see them build that new WTC, the one someone posted on Warpstorm, now that was good, it had everything, memorial, memorial trees, biosphere, sound waves that could keep planes away, it was uber modern and super.

[an0n]

See WS....err......LW.

[Zeronet]

Warpstorm is back at www.librawars.com. The thing i was talking about was posted before WS disappeared.

[beatspete]

As i suggested over on LW, no matter what they build, it'll turn into a Starbucks Coffee Shop within about a week.

[phreak]

http://www.wtc2002.com

[Zeronet]

Originally posted by PhReAk
http://www.wtc2002.com

Thats it! Brilliant building, be so cool if they built it.

[Stryke 9]

Bleargh. I liked the idea (probably not in there) of rebuilding the WTC towers so that instead of being two 110-story buildings, each spot would house 110 one-story buildings.

[Knight Templar]

I liked the idea (probably not in there) of rebuilding the WTC towers so that instead of being two 110-story buildings, each spot would house 110 one-story buildings.

 What would accomplish/stand for?? i like the other idea.

[Stryke 9]

'Cos it's a cool idea. Why else?

[Dark_4ce]

Originally posted by PhReAk
http://www.wtc2002.com

Freaky and utopic. Like a archology. I LIKE IT! But that whole airplane repellent sound wave emitter sounds a bit dodgy.

[an0n]

Originally posted by Dark_4ce
But that whole airplane repellent sound wave emitter sounds a bit dodgy.

A cannon and adequet baggage check would probably be better.

[beatspete]

Originally posted by Dark_4ce

But that whole airplane repellent sound wave emitter sounds a bit dodgy.

Please tell me that's taking the piss.. please.

They can't put up a 5 mile no fly zone around manhattan, Le Guadia Airport is just next to it.  And how will helicoptors get in and out?
Plus why do they think terrorist would do everything the same if they do it again.  They could just as easilly target washington or boston along the coast.

[CP5670]

I dont like those, its sort of giving up by not building something bigger or just as big, almost like letting bin liner win.

I quite agree there; the enemy relies on encouragement to keep their men working for the cause, and erecting an even more ambitious project than what was already there would really be a blow to their morale.

[IceFire]

And if they destroyed it again...think of what our moral would be like?

[Blue Lion]

They wouldn't live after second time. I see that for sure.

[vyper]

They should build something much bigger than the wtc was, and make it a modern engineering miracle of some sort. This should be an opportunity to tell the enemy that nothing will change - they will not win.

[Knight Templar]

I second that, with a vengence! :devilidea

'Cos it's a cool idea. Why else?

oh sorrry, my bad.

[CP5670]

And if they destroyed it again...think of what our moral would be like?

The chances of that are pretty low (recall the Al Qaeda spokesman's statement: "we will strike where they don't expect it"), and besides, if they had any sense they would probably go for a more important target anyway. (like the Capitol building or White House)

[phreak]

Originally posted by an0n

A cannon and adequet baggage check would probably be better.

do you know how hard it is to adequately check baggage these days?  I'll go with the cannon anyday