Author Topic: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.  (Read 4732 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rhys

  • 26
NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
It's no FTL engine, but assuming this is technologically and financially feasible, it could have drastic effects on the future of space travel. Imagine cutting the time it takes to reach Mars by nearly 75%.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive

 

Offline Thisisaverylongusername

  • 27
  • This is fine.
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Wow. Could this mean it's possible to reach the moon in less than a day?
If the opposite of pro is con, then is the opposite of progress Congress?

 
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
So,

a British guy made the thing, and people said he's wrong.

Then chinese guys made the thing, and people didn't care.

Then some american makes it,  NASA finally looks at it and says "oh **** this works" and gets the credit? Man, screw off america.

 

Offline AdmiralRalwood

  • 211
  • The Cthulhu programmer himself!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Reactionless drives? Now  we just need some General Products hulls to put them in...
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Codethulhu GitHub wgah'nagl fhtagn.

schrödinbug (noun) - a bug that manifests itself in running software after a programmer notices that the code should never have worked in the first place.

When you gaze long into BMPMAN, BMPMAN also gazes into you.

"I am one of the best FREDders on Earth" -General Battuta

<Aesaar> literary criticism is vladimir putin

<MageKing17> "There's probably a reason the code is the way it is" is a very dangerous line of thought. :P
<MageKing17> Because the "reason" often turns out to be "nobody noticed it was wrong".
(the very next day)
<MageKing17> this ****ing code did it to me again
<MageKing17> "That doesn't really make sense to me, but I'll assume it was being done for a reason."
<MageKing17> **** ME
<MageKing17> THE REASON IS PEOPLE ARE STUPID
<MageKing17> ESPECIALLY ME

<MageKing17> God damn, I do not understand how this is breaking.
<MageKing17> Everything points to "this should work fine", and yet it's clearly not working.
<MjnMixael> 2 hours later... "God damn, how did this ever work at all?!"
(...)
<MageKing17> so
<MageKing17> more than two hours
<MageKing17> but once again we have reached the inevitable conclusion
<MageKing17> How did this code ever work in the first place!?

<@The_E> Welcome to OpenGL, where standards compliance is optional, and error reporting inconsistent

<MageKing17> It was all working perfectly until I actually tried it on an actual mission.

<IronWorks> I am useful for FSO stuff again. This is a red-letter day!
* z64555 erases "Thursday" and rewrites it in red ink

<MageKing17> TIL the entire homing code is held up by shoestrings and duct tape, basically.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
yay, another quack drive that is really just a wannabe photon drive.

and we could get to mars really ****ing fast if we do a brachistochrone trajectory and a 5g aerocapture maneuver. time this so it gets us there early, spend a week on the surface and we can do a hohmann transfer on the return. make fuel from the atmo while you are on the surface, and you might leave the same way you showed up. in other words it worked in kerbal space program.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2014, 05:35:30 pm by Nuke »
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
first thought when I read this was quantum thruster. there is mention in the article that this may be that and that Shawyer stumbled upon a way to make one.
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Well, if this actually works, this is really strange. Propulsion is one thing, but that might mean a revolution in our understanding of physics. Conversation of momentum is an important concept, so there's either something that the ship "pushes off" and we don't know about it, or there's a major revision of physics coming. I'd place my bets on the former.
So,

a British guy made the thing, and people said he's wrong.

Then chinese guys made the thing, and people didn't care.

Then some american makes it,  NASA finally looks at it and says "oh **** this works" and gets the credit? Man, screw off america.
The British guy didn't look like a serious scientist. Remember, there are many "reactionless drive" and "perpetuum mobile" inventions popping up, this was thought to be one of them. As for Chinese, well, that should've raised a few eyebrows (and it did), but they're not exactly known for their credibility. Remember, extraordinary evidence like this needs to be very thoroughly checked for any interference. It might turn out to be just another FTL neutrinos case. Perhaps there's a systematic error inherent in the testing method, which would explain why Chinese (and that British guy before them) got the same results. That said, if it works, then it'd be much more than a propulsion system. It'd certainly make a stir in vacuum physics, perhaps also in other related fields.

What I wonder about is how much power they fed to it. 720mN is a mighty big thrust for a photon drive (which this probably is some form of, if it's gonna be "reactionless" like this, the exhaust has to have no rest mass), and using a big ol' laser for that would require a ridiculous amount of power (as well as an impractically enormous laser). 50 micronewtons seem somewhat more likely, but would still require considerable power to generate with a normal laser.

 

Offline watsisname

Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Quote
it worked in kerbal space program

Guiding principles for future astronauts
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Quote
it worked in kerbal space program

Guiding principles for future astronauts

it worked in orbiter too.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Hey guys, I was able to get from earth to mars in just a few seconds in Celestia

 :rolleyes:

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
didnt know celestia was a space flight simulator.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Well, if this actually works, this is really strange. Propulsion is one thing, but that might mean a revolution in our understanding of physics. Conversation of momentum is an important concept, so there's either something that the ship "pushes off" and we don't know about it, or there's a major revision of physics coming. I'd place my bets on the former.

if it's a quantum thruster then it's pushing off of virtual particles.
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline watsisname

Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
it worked in orbiter too.

Oh I know. :)  I just wanted to quote that out of context because it's a great line.
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
some videos:

http://vimeo.com/cannae/videos

still seems quackish.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline 666maslo666

  • 28
  • Artificial Neural Network
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Well, if this actually works, this is really strange. Propulsion is one thing, but that might mean a revolution in our understanding of physics. Conversation of momentum is an important concept, so there's either something that the ship "pushes off" and we don't know about it, or there's a major revision of physics coming. I'd place my bets on the former.

if it's a quantum thruster then it's pushing off of virtual particles.

Woudnt that require somehow converting them to real particles and exhausting them (forming a detectable exhaust)?
"For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return." - Leonardo da Vinci

Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win you are still retarded.

 

Offline Wobble73

  • 210
  • Reality is for people with no imagination
    • Steam
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Or drawing them from Species 8472's universe, exhausting them and sending them back to their universe, thus polluting their universe and not ours. Hence them attacking us!  ;7  :lol:
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
Early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
 
Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 You would be well adviced to question the wisdom of older forumites, we all have our preferences and perversions

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
didnt know celestia was a space flight simulator.

It's not. That was the point.

 
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
It uses energy to push against space-time, clearly.

But in all seriousness I'm both incredibly suspicious but also amused if it turns out this is actually a real thing.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
didnt know celestia was a space flight simulator.

It's not. That was the point.

why u no skill?
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: NASA validates "impossible" space drive.
Nice, now we can finally launch all our radioactive waste to space.