Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: vyper on October 01, 2009, 07:32:52 pm

Title: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: vyper on October 01, 2009, 07:32:52 pm
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6857571.ece

Quote
Israel is using an ultra-Orthodox group to crack down on Messianic Jews — who believe that Jesus is the Messiah — and prevent them from staying in the country, officials have told The Times.

The Messianic Jews have been accused of Christian missionary activities and complain of harassment and intimidation by the state.

An official at the Interior Ministry said that an anti-assimilation group called Yad L’Achim was working with the ministry to prevent Messianic Jews — known as Jews for Jesus — from being allowed to live in Israel, which they consider their spiritual home.

“There is a known history of Yad L’Achim working directly with the ministry. They play a distinct role in the ministry’s decision about citizenry,” the official said.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Scotty on October 01, 2009, 08:03:33 pm
Is a Messianic Jew just another name for a Christian?

I don't know what to make of that.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Locutus of Borg on October 01, 2009, 08:16:22 pm
Is a Messianic Jew just another name for a Christian?


Yes
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Scotty on October 01, 2009, 08:21:14 pm
I really don't know what to make of that now.  I am, however, sensing a Godwin in the near future.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: karajorma on October 01, 2009, 08:46:36 pm
Good. Let's hope this continues.


No one seems to care what they do to Muslims but once Christians start being mistreated due to their religion the message might finally get through to America that they can't simply rubber stamp everything Israel does.


As for the term. Jew describes both the religion and the ethnicity. So you can be a Christian Jew, a Muslim Jew or whatever. In order to avoid confusion people use the term Messianic Jew.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Bobboau on October 01, 2009, 08:59:47 pm
"In order to avoid confusion people use the term Messianic Jew."

well they fail, spectacularly.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: karajorma on October 01, 2009, 09:17:44 pm
Didn't confuse me. Christian Jew would confuse more people. :p
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Stealth on October 01, 2009, 09:24:27 pm
dunno if it effects him, but it might affect him :p
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: karajorma on October 01, 2009, 09:49:22 pm
I believe Sandwich is a national there so it's unlikely to affect him. This affects is people who are emigrating to Israel.

Of course I suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: StarSlayer on October 01, 2009, 11:09:48 pm
Good. Let's hope this continues.


No one seems to care what they do to Muslims but once Christians start being mistreated due to their religion the message might finally get through to America that they can't simply rubber stamp everything Israel does.


As for the term. Jew describes both the religion and the ethnicity. So you can be a Christian Jew, a Muslim Jew or whatever. In order to avoid confusion people use the term Messianic Jew.

The wing nuts don't actually care about Israel, their main concern is that they need the Temple Mount rebuilt in order to kick off Judgement Day.  I guess we can thank Legios V Macedonica, XII Fulminata, XV Apollinaris for tearing it down in the first place and putting a kink in their whole apocalypse plan. 


Good Job Titus.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Kosh on October 01, 2009, 11:34:15 pm
Good. Let's hope this continues.


No one seems to care what they do to Muslims but once Christians start being mistreated due to their religion the message might finally get through to America that they can't simply rubber stamp everything Israel does.


As for the term. Jew describes both the religion and the ethnicity. So you can be a Christian Jew, a Muslim Jew or whatever. In order to avoid confusion people use the term Messianic Jew.

There are Arab Christians living in the occupied terroritories, and they are also mistreated under the Israeli occupation.


In reality many American christians will continue to support Israel anyway, because of some non-sensical Book of Revelations End of Days prophetic nonsense.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: BloodEagle on October 01, 2009, 11:50:26 pm
In reality many American christians will continue to support Israel anyway, because of some non-sensical Book of Revelations End of Days prophetic nonsense.

And the blanket insult of the year goes to.... Damn it, I can't get the envelope open. Hang on.

....

....

Iamzack? Huh. That's anticlimactic.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: General Battuta on October 01, 2009, 11:51:25 pm
Although I'd normally stand up against generalization here, 'many American Christians' really isn't inaccurate, y'know.

He didn't say 'all'.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: karajorma on October 01, 2009, 11:54:03 pm
I'm not worried about the wingnuts so much as the way pretty much the rest of the country seems to give Israel carte blanche. If Americans realise that they are persecuting Christians too they might stop seeing it as good guys and bad guys.


Getting back to the main topic though. I've always found it quite funny that the Messianic Jews as a whole have, by and large, tended to be on Jew's side when it came to the whole issue with the Palestinians. For instance I've seen several Messianic Jews argue that Israel is justified in preventing the Palestinian Right of Return on the grounds that if Muslims were allowed to enter the country it would stop Israel being a Jewish state. Guess what? That's pretty much the argument that is now being used against Messianic Jews.

It's almost as if they couldn't see that not arguing in favour of separation of synagogue and state wouldn't one day bite them on the arse. :p
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Kosh on October 02, 2009, 12:44:21 am
Quote
If Americans realise that they are persecuting Christians too they might stop seeing it as good guys and bad guys.


Like I said, for the most part it wont happen, especially when so many preachers are in their churches saying they should support Israel so they can get their Apocalypse going......
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: TrashMan on October 02, 2009, 01:03:22 am
I thought this was old news.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Colonol Dekker on October 02, 2009, 01:39:06 am
Skipped the content. . . .
AFFECTS, not effects. Please, it doesn't take much effort to use words in the right context. This is does my head in.
 
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: karajorma on October 02, 2009, 05:28:29 am
I thought this was old news.

It's old news that some Jews occasionally treat the Christians in a ****ty fashion. This particular method is new to me though.

It still makes it ****ing hilarious that they defend the same behaviour when not directed at them.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: vyper on October 02, 2009, 08:36:24 am
Skipped the content. . . .
AFFECTS, not effects. Please, it doesn't take much effort to use words in the right context. This is does my head in.
 


Telling you to go **** yourself affects my mood. Positively.

That better?
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Dilmah G on October 02, 2009, 08:50:17 am
Hey, just change the thread title and we don't have to whinge about the way Dekker "suggested" it.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Solatar on October 02, 2009, 11:59:37 am

This is does my head in.
 

Whoever is without sin, cast the first stone.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: TESLA on October 02, 2009, 12:06:36 pm
Good. Let's hope this continues.


No one seems to care what they do to Muslims but once Christians start being mistreated due to their religion the message might finally get through to America that they can't simply rubber stamp everything Israel does.


As for the term. Jew describes both the religion and the ethnicity. So you can be a Christian Jew, a Muslim Jew or whatever. In order to avoid confusion people use the term Messianic Jew.

here here!

Isreal gets away with far to much. A joke of a situation.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: MR_T3D on October 02, 2009, 02:12:31 pm

This is does my head in.
 

Whoever is without sin, cast the first stone.
Quote from: Jesus
BLAMO!
and yeah, when i saw the title of this threaad, i was expecting something about a TF2 update, likely another fake one ;7
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: WeatherOp on October 02, 2009, 09:45:46 pm
Very interesting, kind of funny also that I've started to play around with the idea that the Anti-Christ may come from Isreal.

But, anywho, I just wanted to be included in this thread.  :hammer:
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Goober5000 on October 03, 2009, 01:33:21 am
Although I'd normally stand up against generalization here, 'many American Christians' really isn't inaccurate, y'know.

He didn't say 'all'.
...You seem to have missed the fact that only the first half of that sentence was a generalization (and as you said, an accurate one).  The second half was blatant trolling.

In the spirit of stricter enforcement on General Discussion, I'm monkeying Kosh for an indeterminate period.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: vyper on October 03, 2009, 04:47:15 pm
:wtf:
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Snail on October 03, 2009, 05:16:54 pm
I still think reality is an enormous software simulation. Probably run by the Blender Foundation.

Not sure how this is relevant to the topic, but hey. Just throwing ideas around here.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: castor on October 04, 2009, 03:48:38 am
I think that'd make Blender Foundation a god (or whatever supernatural phenomena). Wouldn't change much in these discussions :P
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Sandwich on October 04, 2009, 09:08:40 am
Meh. Yad Le'achim has always been involved in doing what they can to prevent "missionaries" from being in Israel - including lethal violence.

Just like there are "good" Christians (Mother Teresa, say) and "bad" Christians (various extreme cults... inquisitions, and Crusades come to mind), "good" Muslims (your average, Western Muslim) and "bad" Muslims (Achmideninjad (sp?), bin Laden, and the wide assortment of terrorist groups around the world), there are also "good" Jews (your average Israeli, either secular or nominally religious) and "bad" Jews (extremist Yad L'Achim'ers, etc).

Notice, of course, the quotation marks around "good" and "bad" - I'm not intending to get into a debate about what defines good or bad here.

Suffice it to say that in general, whenever anything - particularly religion - is taken to an extreme, it tends to be viewed as "bad". So, while I PERSONALLY hold the opinion that Muslims have it wrong, and that Islam is evil (please note the differentiation between Muslims - people, and Islam - a religion), I would never attempt to impose that viewpoint on anyone, especially not through force or violence. Similarly, while I personally think that Rabbinic Judaism had a good start with the Old Testament but kinda missed the point about 2000 years ago,  I would never attempt to "convert" anyone to my beliefs through any other way than simply living my life according to how I believe God desires me to, and letting that be my witness and testimony to those around me.

In a way, I have a great respect for the various extremists around the world; their steadfastness in adhering to what they see as true, just, and right is something that at times is missing in certain parts of our lives. We've become so wishy-washy about some things that we should stand firm about, that we could stand to learn a lesson - yes, even from the radical extremists. :)
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: jdjtcagle on October 05, 2009, 09:34:28 am
I think that was well spoken.

Even though I'm tolerant of other people and their beliefs I live a radical lifestyle and don't let mainstream Christianity fool you that is not a negative thing.

Quote
People will wrangle for religion, write for it,
fight for it, die for it; anything but live for it.

-Charles Caleb Colton



Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Sandwich on October 05, 2009, 12:05:18 pm
I find it interesting how people often equate "radical" with "fundamental". The words actually mean very different things...
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: jdjtcagle on October 05, 2009, 01:25:43 pm

I'm not sure what your trying to say.
Maybe I'm wrong but in my eyes the terms mean.

Radical: Extreme, I love being who I am. I don't doubt there is a better word.  But going on your thoughts that "various extremist" inspire you? No?

Fundamental:  Foundational?  I consider myself being fundamental in that way, I'm apostolic we go to the roots to discover what the apostles taught not tradition.

...am I wrong?

Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Flipside on October 05, 2009, 03:50:10 pm
A Radical idea is not always a Fundamentalistic one, and vice-versa, I think is what Goober is trying to get across. For example, the idea of flying was radical, but it hardly fundamental. In the same way, someone who has fundamentalist ideas isn't always radical, a radical fundamentalist is someone who is fundamental, and shouts when other people aren't.

Someone who decides to go self-sufficient, is fundamentalist, but not radical, for example, but someone who declares that anyone who doesn't go self-sufficient will end up burning in hell for eternity is being radical.

Personally, as I get older, I read 'radical' as being more synonymous with 'attention whore' than anything else.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Solatar on October 05, 2009, 08:28:28 pm
[quote author=Flipside link=topic=65930.msg1301222#msg1301222 date=1254775810
Personally, as I get older, I read 'radical' as being more synonymous with 'attention whore' than anything else.
[/quote]

Really the best summation I've seen thus far of that term.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Sandwich on October 05, 2009, 09:06:12 pm
I think is what Goober is trying to get across....

Jeez, I know Goob and I met up IRL and all, but isn't it a bit radical of you to presume that we exchanged something as fundamental as user accounts?? :p

I guess I'd always been used to hearing about "Muslim fundamentalists" and "radical extremists" in the same sentence, often referring to the same people groups, and therefore I kinda associated the two terms with each other. You're right that they're not mutually exclusive.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Aardwolf on October 05, 2009, 09:34:38 pm
At least as I use it, "Semitic" is the race, and Jew(ish) is the religion.

Of course, having names for races I can't tell apart by looking at someone is kind of retarded, so I don't use the first much anyway, and religion is stupid in and of itself, so so much for the second one.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: BloodEagle on October 06, 2009, 02:46:25 am
 :wtf:
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Sandwich on October 06, 2009, 05:52:55 am
At least as I use it, "Semitic" is the race, and Jew(ish) is the religion.

Arabs are also Semitic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic). FYI.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: NGTM-1R on October 06, 2009, 06:04:36 am
And Iranians are actually Aryan...
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Flipside on October 06, 2009, 09:18:00 am
I think is what Goober is trying to get across....

Jeez, I know Goob and I met up IRL and all, but isn't it a bit radical of you to presume that we exchanged something as fundamental as user accounts?? :p

I guess I'd always been used to hearing about "Muslim fundamentalists" and "radical extremists" in the same sentence, often referring to the same people groups, and therefore I kinda associated the two terms with each other. You're right that they're not mutually exclusive.

D'oh! Sorry, don't know what possessed me to confuse you and Goober :nervous:
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: aldo_14 on October 24, 2009, 09:08:00 am
Although I'd normally stand up against generalization here, 'many American Christians' really isn't inaccurate, y'know.

He didn't say 'all'.
...You seem to have missed the fact that only the first half of that sentence was a generalization (and as you said, an accurate one).  The second half was blatant trolling.

In the spirit of stricter enforcement on General Discussion, I'm monkeying Kosh for an indeterminate period.

I heard you'd turned into Ayatollah Goober, but I had to see it for myself....
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Kosh on October 24, 2009, 10:11:24 am
It's been resolved. Moving along........
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: General Battuta on October 24, 2009, 10:17:55 am
There were some checks and balances. It's all good.
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: iamzack on October 24, 2009, 10:21:07 am
*opens fire in the thread*
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Thaeris on October 24, 2009, 08:05:08 pm
[a large cascade of water washes away the dreams and unsupportable motives of iamzack]

*DENIED!!!
Title: Re: This effects Sandwich, right?
Post by: Sandwich on October 25, 2009, 06:34:22 am
I heard you'd turned into Ayatollah Goober, but I had to see it for myself....

Welcome back. You're in the wrong thread, though... go here (http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php?topic=65797.0) - that's where all the returnees are being kept for processing... ;)