[Stryke 9]

It's called a "monopoly", son. It means that nobody gets more than 5% until someone right ****s over the big guy- something the government has to do, not the corporations. Unless one of the corporations is Mafia-run and offs Bill Gates one day or somethin'.

[Turnsky]

doesn't microsoft like OWN 50% of apple?

[Grey Wolf]

AMD fanboy that I am, I'm waiting for this:

Well, not really, I'm actually waiting for San Diego and Victoria

[Drew]

Originally posted by Stryke 9
It's called a "monopoly", son. It means that nobody gets more than 5% until someone right ****s over the big guy- something the government has to do, not the corporations. Unless one of the corporations is Mafia-run and offs Bill Gates one day or somethin'.

well most economists would call Microsoft an obolisk of capitalism

and it was admitted buy the mac CEO that they have no desire to get bigger, they think that their size is just fine for now.......

ms has its day now, but the futer of OS's is open source as u can c linux is getting used much more.....
maybe wont be long till ms makes its own open source (when bill gates is dead ofc )

[Stryke 9]

You seen most freeware, son? It ain't pretty- Linux is an extraordinary exception, but even that's patchy compared to pro work.

[Grey Wolf]

You know, I'm really suprised that people still focus on Apple so much. It's market share is diminutive compared to Intel and AMD.

[Stryke 9]

Yeah, but that's hardware, whereas Apple's a hardware-software package. And there's really nothing more to say about Mac hardware- only the looniest of the Mac loonies are gonna claim that Mac computers themselves, with their ****ty mice, keyboard software-based power buttons, and lack of floppy drives or other redeeming qualities are actually better.

Same sorta story with Intel and AMD. Intel's faster, AMD's cheaper. End of story.