Author Topic: GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!  (Read 10081 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
Not everyone is building super ships. There are quite a few campaigns that don't have any.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Arculis

  • 26
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
I still find it peculiar that there art so many custom destroyers out there, but not so many custom cruisers, considering how much more common cruisers art (or should be).

Cruisers are going to end up getting phased out sometime soon. Who needs 'em when you've got just as many destroyers?

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
Here's a custom cruiser:





Cruisers have their place, if only as escorts for transports (as they are faster than the larger ships) and as anti-fighter platforms.  There should be more of them in a larger fleet.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
That thing has Taiidan Destroyer written all over it.
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!

 

Offline redmenace

  • 211
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
I love it!!!!!!!!!!!!
Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.
              -Frederic Bastiat

 

Offline Unknown Target

  • Get off my lawn!
  • 212
  • Push.Pull?
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
I agree completely. Looks like an almost exact copy :D

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
I'd be absolutely forced to give it a better texture job if I was able to procureth such a model.

(sorry, but since that stupid template, I've been unable to stop the -eths)
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
Classifying ships by size insted by size AND function is wrong from the begging.

The biggest ship you have in the gmae, heavily armed and DOESN'T carry fighter/bomberrs - that's a Battleship

The biggest ships you have that does carry fighter/bombers and is not uber-armed - that's a (heavy) Carrier...

Now, proceed clasyifying all other ships compared to these (since you can call a standard FS2 cruiser a destroyer or a cruiser, and I'll not get into that)...
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
Except every ship destroyer size or above in FS carries fighters and bombers...
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

  

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
GTVF(former GTVA) fleet size trouble!!!
Trashman's got his own classification system that probably doesn't relate to most people's works or any reference from :V:.  I'd think that the most logical system is to establish a naming convention, which :V: did seemingly on the basis of size alone, and stick with that.  If the GTVA is introducing a new Frigate class into the mix, then new alien ships similar to this new class would be designated "Frigates".  The Moloch has a fighterbay, but it is a corvette; if the GTVA built a light strike carrier with the size of a corvette, somewhat undergunned, and a fighterbay, then the Moloch would probably be reclassified as a Strike Carrier.  The GTVA, aside from the Colossus, has nothing larger than a Destroyer, so when a systematic class of vessels appears that falls well above the criteria for destroyers they are labeled Juggernauts, a non-technical, non-milatary term meaning essentially "really powerful."  If the Colossus was standardized as, say, a Dreadnaut class, then the Sathanas would probably be reclassed a Dreadnaut.  Truth be told, no one knows enough about the Shivans to give a quantative analysis to their categorization of ship types, so the ones used by the GTVA are applied.  Now the introduction of classes into the classification scheme should be kept to a minimum I think, but if you're going to add one or two into the fleet you're fighting for, then by all means feel free to do so.  Just don't expect other people to use your classifications outside of your project.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM