Short version:I have an SATA HDD that suddenly started giving me "Delayed Write Failed" errors. I can't write large chunks of data to it, regardless of what OS I'm in (2k or XP), but I can read data no problem. Win2k is installed to that drive, while WinXP is installed to a sister drive. It seems some people have had this problem due to ATI driver conflicts. I had installed Omega drivers into Win2k, and soon after started getting the error. Uninstalling those drivers doesn't help. In WinXP, I have Catalyst drivers that never gave me a problem, and I still get the error when writing to the Win2k drive. Any ideas, before I take it in to get professionally repaired?
Long version:Up until a week ago or so, I was running Windows 2k on one of my 160Gb SATA HDDs. One day, I started getting a "Delayed Write Error" alert box, telling me that the system had failed to complete writing something or another to disk.
So I researched it a bit, found most references to the cause of the problem being (believe it or not) a conflict with an ATI gfx card driver. Which sorts made sense - in a twisted way - since I'd recently tried out the Omega drivers.
So I uninstall the Omega drivers, reinstall the Catalyst... no difference. The eystem is still failing to write large amounts of data to my Win2k disk. However, I notice that writing to any other HDD works fine.
Now, on my other 160Gb SATA HDD, I have Windows XP running. So I boot into XP, and immediately get a lot less errors (since it's booting off the other disk, not the one with the problems). However, when I try to write a largeish chunk of data to my Win2k disk, I get the same "Delayed Write Failed" error (except it's a notification balloon in XP, not an alert box).
This indicates to me that this problem is something beyond an OS getting messed up. I can still read any and all data from the problematic drive, no problem at all. I just can't write too much to it.
Obviously, the best thing is to go get it exchanged, but I wanted to tap you guy's knowledge of things and see if anyone has a better, easier, and cheaper solution. Thanks.
