[Ulundel]

Which one do you like?
My vote goes to UT and especially to UT 2003. You can play Quake about two weeks, then you get bored...I hate those who say Quake 3 is better...I hate PC Gamer...

[phreak]

[Ulundel]

Sweeeeet!

and UT 2003 menu music is...unreal...

[Redfang]

Well, UT2003 (haven't played too much) might be better than Quake 3, but I don't like original UT too much, though used to like it, too.

[Levyathan]

Quake 3 is better.

[Ulundel]

Originally posted by Levyathan
Quake 3 is better.

why?

[mikhael]

Where's the "First Person Shooters are for lackwit imbeciles who thing pro-wrestling is real" option?

[Ulundel]

Originally posted by mikhael
Where's the "First Person Shooters are for lackwit imbeciles who thing pro-wrestling is real" option?

Well, people are not taking them seriously (at least I'm not). Just when you have nothing to do...and again i remind you that UT 2003 has one of the best soundtracks I've ever heard.

[diamondgeezer]

Originally posted by mikhael
Where's the "First Person Shooters are for lackwit imbeciles who thing pro-wrestling is real" option?

Hey, you're talking to someone about to play a few rounds of Black Hawk Down whilst wearing a Rock "Just Bring It" t-shirt, ya know...

[Black_Dragon]

I dont have Unreal Tournament.   But i like what i see in the commercials and reviews.

I Have Quake 3,  and i still like it,  sometimes i play the game  in nightmare and all the bots that i can fill in the game, in skirmish mode. "funny"  jeje  

[Ulundel]

Originally posted by Black_Dragon
I dont have Unreal Tournament.   But i like what i see in the commercials and reviews.

I Have Quake 3,  and i still like it,  sometimes i play the game  in nightmare and all the bots that i can fill in the game, in skirmish mode. "funny"  jeje  

and with UT 2003 it's even more fun!

[phreak]

my usefulness drops off at godlike

[Dynamo]

UT2k3 is awesome if your computer doesn't suck, like mine. I didn't like the demo, but the full version is quite good.

[Fineus]

Likewise, I thought the demo was "ok" but the full version was so much better, installed it shortly before my latest LAN trip and loved every minute of the entire day we spent playing it. The game feels so much more "real" than the original UT. I know it's all futuristic and such but it just has a polished feel that Q3 had, and now UT2003 has as well.

However, if I want vanilla deathmatch where the fastest finger off the button wins, I'll still look to Q3. If I want teamplay, I'm going with UT2003 (we had some incredible moments during the bombing run missions, true quality in a match where everything felt right. It was beautiful and once it was over everyone just sat back for a minute and grinned - we all knew we'd pulled together to win it).

Moments like them - they're what make games for me now.

[Galemp]

Q3A looked nicer, but UT has soooo much better gameplay.

[Levyathan]

Originally posted by Ten of Twelve
why?

Originally posted by Ten of Twelve
I hate those who say Quake 3 is better...

[vadar_1]

Originally posted by GalacticEmperor
Q3A looked nicer, but UT has soooo much better gameplay.

UT2003 is so much better then q3a... making q3a entirly useless... except its engine was used pretty good with JKII. But theres no challange with a direct competition... even PCGamer agrees... do i even need to say it?

and since when does uT say "Holy ****"?

[Nico]

neither Quake3 or UT.
battlefield 1942 all the way. or renegade, coz the c&c mode is so cool.

[phreak]

Originally posted by vadar_1

and since when does uT say "Holy ****"?

Double Kill
Multi Kill
Mega Kill
Ultra Kill
M O N S T E R K I L L
L U D I C R I O U S
HOLY ****!

[Dranon]

You really can't compare Quake 3 and UT2003.  3 years seperate these two titles, with UT2003 looking so much better, and taking advantage of all the things people wanted in both Quake 3, and UT.  

Between Q3A and UT, i've never played UT, but i would like it about the same.  I do have Q3A, and hope to get UT soon, as my computer will have a heart attack if it tries to run UT2003...