Author Topic: 3D Mark 2003  (Read 4940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ulundel

  • Big press poppa
  • 210
Futuremark has just released 3D Mark 2003 though I haven't found a working mirror yet. Once again we can see some great graphics and ultimate detail. :)

http://www.futuremark.com

 

Offline Ryx

  • Twilight Falling
  • 29
  • Away in RL land. Back later.
I'm going to try to d/l later. Looks good. :)
Intel C2D E6850|4Gb RAM|Abit IP35 PRO|ATI X1900 XT

 

Offline Petrarch of the VBB

  • Koala-monkey
  • 211
It'll only be depressing, tell you that you're GFX card is ****. That's why I stll use 2000. :D

 

Offline Redfang

  • 28
Yesterday it was next to impossible get when it was released (at around 4PM GMT), and still seems to be very slow. And that makes it even worse, is that the download is 177MB.
 
Soon I can see some awesome and laggy graphics. w00t! :p

  

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
3DMark03 score
3DMark2001 SE score

I don't think it was next to impossible to get, not if you have a good download manager, like Flashget. :p
But I was amazed of the fact that only the first test (Wings of Fury) runs smoothly! :eek2:

*sigh* Makes my puter to feel ancient.:blah:
« Last Edit: February 12, 2003, 07:16:32 am by 173 »

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
This is really depressing - I remember when I used to get 12K on the old tests... now I'm reduced to around the 1600 range. I'll get a proper benchmark later since I didn't optimise everything and shut down the internet before running it.

Still...sad...

 

Offline Stunaep

  • Thread Necrotech.... we bring the dead to life!
  • 210
I´ll d/load that the minute I get home. I still think, I can expect a good 8000-9000 range, with my uberpower new pc.
"Post-counts are like digital penises. That's why I don't like Shrike playing with mine." - an0n
Bah. You're an admin, you've had practice at this spanking business. - Odyssey

 

Offline Ulundel

  • Big press poppa
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Stunaep
I´ll d/load that the minute I get home. I still think, I can expect a good 8000-9000 range, with my uberpower new pc.


Don't get your hopes too high. I'll bet you get say...max 4000 or 5000. Maybe less

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
bah, 3dmark is biaised, gives advantage to Nvidia cards from the begining. I'll try it for the pretty scenes tho :P
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
Quote
Originally posted by venom2506
bah, 3dmark is biaised, gives advantage to Nvidia cards from the begining. I'll try it for the pretty scenes tho :P

Nvidia Discredit The Validity Of 3DMark2003 As A Gamer's Benchmark

Bunch of whiners I say... (And I have NVIDIA card)

 

Offline Ulundel

  • Big press poppa
  • 210
NVIDIA chipsets are teh best!

 

Offline Stunaep

  • Thread Necrotech.... we bring the dead to life!
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Ulundel


Don't get your hopes too high. I'll bet you get say...max 4000 or 5000. Maybe less

*reads the score comparison*

:eek2:

:eek2:

:eek2:

Now I´´m betting at 2000-4000
"Post-counts are like digital penises. That's why I don't like Shrike playing with mine." - an0n
Bah. You're an admin, you've had practice at this spanking business. - Odyssey

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
Quote
Originally posted by Ulundel
NVIDIA chipsets are teh best!

I hope this is not going to become a flame war.

I tell you this, there is no clear winner in ATI vs. NVIDIA battle. Both are good but both also has their flaws.

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
Well said that man :)

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Downloading it now, but I can already guess that my old score will be cut in a fourth at least. :p
« Last Edit: February 12, 2003, 10:02:18 am by 296 »

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
Rightyo - my score came out as 1644.

Edit: For reference - my 2001SE score was 12037...

I'm going to go and cry for a bit now... excuse me.

 

Offline Ulundel

  • Big press poppa
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Kalfireth
Rightyo - my score came out as 1644.

I'm going to go and cry for a bit now... excuse me.


Pretty good I think...mine would be probably 60 :doubt:

 

Offline Redfang

  • 28
Quote
Originally posted by Stunaep
I´ll d/load that the minute I get home. I still think, I can expect a good 8000-9000 range, with my uberpower new pc.
What video card and processor? :p
 
(Nobody has got that much)
 
Edit: And Thunder, why care that much about 3dmark? The fact that GF4's don't support DirectX 9.0 drops the score a lot. Yet, games that support DirectX 9.0 will not come this year most likely.
 
Edit2: And I can't run it. Crashes after 35seconds from start. Which is too bad (most of my 3D apps do (not FS2 though)).
« Last Edit: February 12, 2003, 11:39:57 am by 665 »

 

Offline Ulundel

  • Big press poppa
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Redfang
What video card and processor? :p
 
(Nobody has got that much)


Quote
*reads the score comparison*
Now I´´m betting at 2000-4000

 

Offline Petrarch of the VBB

  • Koala-monkey
  • 211
Huzzah for running old benchmarks so that you get a higher score!