Deepblue: And so you're more trusting of... what, exactly? Some militant rightist Dixiecrat rag produced by the Freemen with tinfoil hat making tips on the back page? I'm sure they're
so much more reliable.
Of course, "reading between the lines" is a foreign concept to you. It requires conprehension and a basic understanding of geopolitics.
FalconX: I'll say to you what I said to Sandwich. Give 'em guns, give 'em bombs, give 'em the
ability to fight the military without it being just outright suicide, and I can guarantee they would pick Army targets over civilians every time. Nobody likes killing civilians when it's avoidable, even if you don't care about them it's bad tactics on the whole as compared to military, but with the current military power gap and governmental indifference to damn near everything not war anyone who has a beef with the US has pretty much no alternative
but terrorism. It's not like they're about to just go stand in front of one of our tank columns waving little signs saying "Shoot me!"
Or, just remove the contention point. Takes a lot more work, but until you're willing to treat the problem one way or the other don't complain. 'Cos there's only gonna be more and more, and you might as well get used to it.