Originally posted by ZylonBane
The final episode of B5 was garbage. It had absolutely no redeeming standalone qualities, relying instead on its "Hey! I'm the last episode!" status to carry it through. The destruction of B5 was pointless ("It's a hazard to navigation and nobody comes here anymore." Huh??) and ineptly executed (they blew it up, creating massive amounts of spaceborne debris, instead of simply deorbiting it). The Ascension of Sheridan was so predictably executed it was painful to watch. 2001 did it better, 30+ years ago. And then JMS goes introducing some new story arc... in the final episode! Bleah.
B5 has its good points, but the fundamental problem with it is that JMS is a science fiction fan, not a science fiction writer. The science in B5 was pretty firmly at the comic-book level.
Ah, so because JMS creates probably the most literary, interesting characters that actually evolve during the series, a story that is at least slightly original (oh, I so loved the freakishly original and allegorical (allegory! how many years has it been since I saw you on screen) ending to the shadow war arc) and all that with half of ST's budget, he's not an SF writer. While what the people who keep pumping out crap like Enterprise are? Oh yeah.
Yes, the science is at a comic-book level, but face it: it's better than "Rotate-transphasic-generators-at-megalopump-carnivorous-antonymity" stuff we get at some of the later ST episodes. Hell even Asimov has hyperdrives.
I don't quite understand what new arc JMS introduced in SiL. I do understand that the blowing up B5 part was supposed to illustrate how the fates of Sheridan and B5 are closely tied. Besides, it made one hell of a emotion-impression thing.
I just think you want to argue.