Hm... it's depressing how accurate mine was (and, near as I can tell, all of yours were), but the more I look at it the more it's starting to look like the old psychic game, use a little knowledge and some generalities about people in general, play on the way they prefer to think of themselves (always a typecast role, that), and you've got a portrait that looks terribly accurate to that person. There are some things about other peoples' here that don't fit me so well, and some things about mine that wouldn't apply to others, but on the whole they're mostly about similar- most of the stuff can be translatable to fit on someone so that even if it isn't a major facet of their personality, they think immediately of some small part that it resembles and think "wow, that's right"- I can read "You tend to see things in "wholes" without surrendering the ability to attend to details." and think of FD, which has over the years reached proportions that make Dune look thinly tolerable, even though it's just one thing, and same with everything else, and everyone else. So, really, the thing is only about half as accurate as it seems, at most.
Still pretty good, though. and still depressing how homogenous and predictable we all are, that such dirty tricks (or, indeed, profiling) can work so well given such little information.