Author Topic: Saddam Captured  (Read 13356 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
I thought the point of war was to win. Sanctions being just one method.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Quote
Originally posted by mikhael
It had been weakened to the point where it couldn't possibly be a threat to anyone.


Although in this case it certainly seems to be true, those sounds suspiciously like a classic "Famous Last Words" example, y'know?
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
That's a prudent, and justified, skepticism. Skepticism is a good thing, especially since it is two-edged. We can be skeptical about how ineffective Iraq's military might have been at the same time as we are skeptical about whether or not Hussein was hiding banned weapons. Skepticism is merely a call for proof, not a denunciation of it.
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
Quote
Originally posted by Sandwich
Perhaps wisely, even, depending on if those reports of the French govt. sharing info with Iraq are true or not.


As much as I like you, I'll suggest you to go to hell. I can't believe you out of all people can consider a completly dumb rumour like that possible.
I'm really disapointed, this time. I don't even feel like arguing over the fact you consider we could be the enemy of the USA ( coz that's what it would imply ), I'm too disgusted.
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Quote
Originally posted by Nico
Quote
Originally posted by Sandwich
Perhaps wisely, even, depending on if those reports of the French govt. sharing info with Iraq are true or not.


As much as I like you, I'll suggest you to go to hell. I can't believe you out of all people can consider a completly dumb rumour like that possible.
I'm really disapointed, this time. I don't even feel like arguing over the fact you consider we could be the enemy of the USA ( coz that's what it would imply ), I'm too disgusted. [/B]


:(

Dude, you misunderstood, apparently - or I did. I seem to recall when issues concerning the French position on the attack on Iraq came up a few months back that you made a point that the views of the French government were not necessarily the views of the French public. Since then, I've tried not to refer to "France" or "the French", but to "the French government".

But to cut to the heart of the matter, yes, I do believe it's possible that the French government (and you could put in here Russian, German, etc - doesn't make a difference) could have been sharing intelligence information with the Iraqi government. Why should that be so unbelieveable? Governments have said one thing while working at cross-purposes for centuries.

But does that mean that I would consider the French goveernment an enemy of the US? Hardly, although - if those reports (which has the same root as the word "reportedly", remember) are true - they certainly weren't helping matters any.
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

  

Offline Grey Wolf

The primary problem with the Bush administration's handle on the whole concept of terrorism, and the nation in general, is that they choose superficial actions in the most part, and their more complex attempts they attempt to pull focus away from after they turn sour. Not to mention the exceptional favoritism that they show big business in general and Haliburton specifically, their attempts to prevent any enviromental reform....
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
in a world were some people beleve Bush staged the 9-11 atacks in a bid for global domination, why is the thought that some European government(s) could be trying to play both sides around the middle so insane.

I was wondering, how do the french feel about there government? do you generaly trust your leaders, or do you hold them suspect (not anything to do with Iraq, just something I was wondering with all the consperesy theorys and 'Bush is a lier' stuff)
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline icespeed

  • 3574
  • 28
war, on the whole, is a stupid idea. but sometimes people declare it to be necessary. that might have been so. what's past is past; we can't go back and say, 'yeah, but if this had happened'... cos we don't know, we can't ever know. all the past is ever really good for is supporting argument for what to do next, because you can't change the past. only the future.

even so: i think the iraqi war was necessary if not wanted; i think there's two sides to every argument and neither of them are correct; i think there's alot about the mindset of various people, governments and politicians from the culture of their countries that no one really takes into account when dealing with them; i think some one's going to be stupid enough to start a nuke war simply to prevent the other guy winning; and i think our leaders are leaders for a reason, so we should probably put a little trust into them if not much.
$quot;Let your light shine before men...$quot;
Matthew 5:16

When I graduate, I'm going to be a doctor, and people are going to come to me looking for treatment and prescription drugs, and I'm going to give it to them. Is anyone scared yet?

$quot;If you confess with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord', and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.$quot; Romans 10:9