Originally posted by Zeronet
But in this case, there iraqi insurgents, practically terrorists because they target their own people, who are quite simply, evil. Thus, i'd much rather they died, than british soldiers, who are trying to help this country, not hinder it. Though of course, i'd much rather they were imprisoned, but that is not practical in these circumstances.

Great stuff.
Terrorists are defined as people who murder, in an organized fashion and on a large scale, civilians. The bombing of Iraq has killed well over 10,000 civilians. Now, tell me again, who are the terrorists?
The fighters in Iraq right now, they are what is called a resistance movement. Perhaps you've heard of such a concept. They exist to drive out the American soldiers who are illegally occupying their country. This seems like a legitimate cause to me.
But let me guess, anyone who kills Americans, soldiers or not, is a terriorist? Right?
Thundfireth: Right on. However, I thought that Three Kings was the usual "brave Americans" movie. Real soldiers would never do that, never risk their lives for Iraqis. They would take the gold and gun everyone else down. The Americans were glorified, the Iraqis (well, those who weren't shown as helpless victims) weere demonized, as usual.
I STRONGLY urge you to go rent a movie called No Man's Land. It shows just how ****ed up war really is, without skewing the perception to any one side.