Originally posted by J3Vr6
No, I know the meaning of ambivalent but thank you for the vocabulary lesson
If you'd read your post again (although I'm sure you know what you wrote), you said that since you got fired from there, you were ambivalent whether you were going. No comment was made whether or not you thought the movie was going to suck poo. My razor edge logic would tell me that it was because of you losing your job and not your taste in cinema that you weren't going. Hence the sarcasm in my post.
No, you were right that the reason I am unsure whether I'll see the movie is the personal history involved. Your error is on two other points.
1) I said I was ambivalent, not that I knew I wouldn't go see it. On the one hand,I have some personal connection with the movie (they were our props), which would make me inclined to want to see the movie regardless whether it looked like a good film or not. On the other, the personal history would probably set me in a bad mood the whole time long. So I have two factors pulling me in opposite directions, and thus I am unsure whether I should spend my limited cash on tickets.
2) You make a faulty assumption about the connection between the personal history and the ambivalence. You thought I wasn't sure if I'd go or not because I wanted to get revenge by not giving them my $15. But I have no interest in vengence. My only thought is that awareness of the personal history might overshadow my ability to enjoy the movie, making it a waste of my money. That's all.
What bothered me in your post was that you assumed I was being petty, and on that basis ridiculing me for being so ineffective at accomplishing what you thought were surely my goals (some sort of revenge). To have such false assumptions made about oneself is never a nice experience. Think before you speak, J3Vr6---not everyone in the world is filled with spite.