Originally posted by Nuke
i mor see it as a target for fs2open, to support the most common hardware currently availible. its amazing how spending a couple hundred bucks on a video card is enough to make one biased twards that particular manufacturer. noone wants to admit that their "state of the art hardware" is second rate. back when i got my top of the line voodoo 3 (and at the time it was state of the art) i swore id never buy a nvidia product. now im running a geforce 4 mx420. ive also used ati chipsets and frankly i cant really tell the difference. non biased opinions about video cards are rare. the nforce chipset is a good thing though, id much rather have a mobo chipset from a company that knows games than one that ive never heard of before.
Now that's, much, more Developer like thinking.
To write tailoring for just one card is selfish/immature/biased.
It kills the market SCP might appeal to, and it narrows any chance of bringing an FS2 back to life.
"Look at this, the greatest game in the world, it's available free too, and the fan community has massively updated and modified it to make it even better!"
"Cool!" *Gets it*
"Hey... I get **** FPS... it looks ****... it generally IS ****..."
"You got a Nvidia card? heh **** you."

....................Yea ok, so instantly over 46% of computer users wont be able to have a decent FS2 SCP Experience because of a little bias/ignorance.
Again, like I said, the thread wasn't really about which card was better, it was about the failure I see brewing.
Since I know another potentially massively successful game, that completely failed, because all it supported was NV Cards and ATI Cards Crashed all the time on it, simply because the lead Dev didn't cater for the ATI Cards (This was only first after 30months retail ¬.¬), don't want the mistake repeated here with NV Cards either.