Originally posted by Reez
i didn't forget about Britain. But when war came around, you guys were sorely unprepared. But GO UK! Awesome navy, what with all the killings of German U-boats you did.
Not to mention the ****-kicking given to all and sundry in the Med.
Aldo: We had the biggest navy, including the biggest warship (the Hood), but a lot of the ships weren't as up-to-date as they needed to be. The heaviest ships (the Nelson and Rodney battleships) were very powerful (9 16" guns) but slow, and most of the battleship fleet (about 25 ships IIRC) were at least 15-20 years old, with the Great War-style designs (such as the Barham, Malaya, Warspite, Ramillies, etc.). The only new ones were the King George V-class, which started to enter service in 1939 IIRC. Our carriers were also fairly old for the most part, with ships like the Indefatigable dating back to the early 20s (with the exception of the Ark Royal, finished in '37 I think), though we did have more than anyone else. The Americans were probably about equal to us in terms of strength, though they lost a massive chunk of their power at Pearl Harbour (8 battleships sunk), and they never really regained it.
And you were right about the counter-intelligence prior to D-Day - the Germans thought that the British 4th Army was going to invade Norway in the spring of 1944. The 4th Army didn't actually exist - it was all inflatable tanks!
Anyway, getting back to USA vs PRC: I think that any US Navy task force would suffer heavy damage from the Chinese, though they would probably return the favour. As for carrier "durability", a hit from a Moskit or Yakhont would wipe out a carrier almost instantly. Even if the hit didn't destroy the carrier outright, it would be taken out of the battle straight away.