Genryu, Tin Can:
Ah, you are wise and all-knowing indeed, if you think that can decide who is "reliable" and who is not. If anyone can have nukes, everyone can have nukes. No one has the right to deny them what you (the US) already has, because as I said, that would be adoublt standard. You can think what you want, but you have to ackowledge that your opinion, the US's opinion, and the UN's opinion counts for exactly ****, unless you yourselves diasrm.
I'm not in favour of everyone having nukes, I am in favour of everyone having the right to have nukes. I would think that it would be obvious by now that I am anti-nuke, and favour total disarmament. But until that happens, you have no right to take the moral highground.
But lets just say, for the sake of conversation, that only "trustworthy" countries can posses nukes. Lets take a look at the record, in the past 60 or so years:
North Korea -
0 invasions (well 1, if you count the Korean War as being NK's fault). never used nukes.
America:
Nearly a dozen invasions of foreign nations, countless coups, meddling in foreign affairs and generally undermining sovereignty. Only country to ever use nukes.
So tell me, who is more trustworthy?