Originally posted by JR2000Z
No. Kerry is less likely to go after him than Bush.
Talk about irony, having the Republican convention being held at Madison Square Garden in NYC does seem a little convenient for the terrorists doesn't it? They could bomb the subways, use car bombs, snipers, etc.
I don't think so, Bin Laden is the Arch Enemy in the eyes of America, Kerry is aware of that and will pursue him with just as much vigour, though possibly with a great deal more tact.
That is why he would want Bush to stay in power, with the Bush administration bulldozing their way through Middle East relations and generally promoting support for terrorist groups by running rickshod over anything that doesn't suit them.
If relations improve between America and the Middle East, this would be bad for Bin Laden. I severely doubt he is operating on some altruistic goals of freedom for his people, he just wants a 'slice of the cake'.
Much (though by no means all) mistrust of America before 9/11 in the Middle East was because they were, to a certain degree, being used as scapegoats to detract from certain Middle Eastern leaders appalling spending regimes, which spent far more on luxuries and weapons than on food and clothing and basic services (I know there is far more to it than this, but that is a
very simplified description). Bush, however, has managed to make an intangible target into a tangible one.