Author Topic: Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes  (Read 4329 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Easy, he'd just fly through the Nacelles, and pop goes the Warp Core ;)

Although, I have to say, this person doesn't make the one comparison that makes the entire discussion pointless, which is 'What was the main race in each universe doing 5000 years ago'. Now SW vs ST+5000 years would be a more interesting comparison ;)

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Quote
Originally posted by MetalDestroyer
You forgot The Yuzhan Vong from the Expended Universe :p

Ouch... game, set and match to Star Wars!

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
He's making the mistake of only using one race vs. one race. The name of the discussion is "Star Wars vs Star Trek", not "The Empire vs The Federation". If he held to his original purpose, he would include Species 8472, or even Q, in which case Star Wars wouldn't stand a chance.
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Oh... go on then ;)

Not to mention he's also only compared comparative technology, i.e. Laser weapons, engines etc. Star Trek has things like Transporter tech, seemingly more advanced computer and holographic technology, advanced cloaking tech etc, etc. Theres no real way to make an estimate of the impact these techs would have.

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Quote
Originally posted by Flipside

Although, I have to say, this person doesn't make the one comparison that makes the entire discussion pointless, which is 'What was the main race in each universe doing 5000 years ago'. Now SW vs ST+5000 years would be a more interesting comparison ;)

Heh, so true. The Feds have Uber Time Travel o' D00M tech in the 29th century already :p

Empire has been there for 25,000 years, the Federation only for 200 years or so.

:D
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Fed tech is more adaptable, more modular.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Windows is teh 3mpire! :lol:

As an aside, can I just ask here, the second Death Star was larger than the first, and the first was the size of a 'small moon', which is presumably bigger than a 'large asteroid'.

If this is the case would not:

a) Such an object have a large effect on the gravitic tides of Endor, thus causing massive tidal and environmental changes?

b) The destruction of a generator powerful enough to create a laser that destroys planets have left Endor a flame-ravaged husk?

c) The destruction of a shield generator powerful enough to envelop a moon in orbit have had much the same blast area as a massive nuclear detonation?

Just curious ;)

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Quote
Originally posted by Flipside
Windows is teh 3mpire! :lol:

As an aside, can I just ask here, the second Death Star was larger than the first, and the first was the size of a 'small moon', which is presumably bigger than a 'large asteroid'.

If this is the case would not:

a) Such an object have a large effect on the gravitic tides of Endor, thus causing massive tidal and environmental changes?

b) The destruction of a generator powerful enough to create a laser that destroys planets have left Endor a flame-ravaged husk?

c) The destruction of a shield generator powerful enough to envelop a moon in orbit have had much the same blast area as a massive nuclear detonation?

Just curious ;)


I've read in some bizarre site that the Death Star would have created sufficient debris to devastate Endor.  However, I suspect this is was 'calculated' because the author really, really hated Ewoks.

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Gandalf vs Darth Vader vs Kirk!!!! :nervous: :D

This is like making a match Jehova vs Buda :D









(Buda wins) :nervous:
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
:lol:

This is getting pretty hysterical...

 

Offline Fineus

  • ...But you *have* heard of me.
  • Administrator
  • 212
    • Hard Light Productions
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Quote
Originally posted by Carl
He's making the mistake of only using one race vs. one race. The name of the discussion is "Star Wars vs Star Trek", not "The Empire vs The Federation". If he held to his original purpose, he would include Species 8472, or even Q, in which case Star Wars wouldn't stand a chance.

But Star Wars has The Force. That has to count for something.

That said.. Q - being god like - is something of a power-gamers trump card in this conflict of franchises. I think he should be banned from use under some kind of WMD act ;)

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Quote
Originally posted by Flipside
As an aside, can I just ask here, the second Death Star was larger than the first, and the first was the size of a 'small moon', which is presumably bigger than a 'large asteroid'.


The Death Star was 120 km in diameter. the second one was 160 km.
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
hmmmm... possibly not enough to have a gravitic effect as such then, but still, not a small object to have blow up in orbit ;)

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
And thus enters the Culture :D
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
[q]That said.. Q - being god like - is something of a power-gamers trump card in this conflict of franchises. I think he should be banned from use under some kind of WMD act [/q]

And our favorite Q would be likely to completely destroy the rebel's rationality with his cutting sarcasm. ;)
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
Heh, at least Q agrees Trek is full of technobabble :D

"Picard and his lackeys would have solved all this technobabble hours ago." -- Q

;)

And ofcourse the ever so hilarious talk to Worf;

"Eaten any good books lately?" -- Q

:p
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
"Please don't tell me the story of the boy who cried Worf!"
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

  

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
This is the sort of thing I might have pondered with my friends when I was about eleven.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline silverwolf

  • 27
  • whoa...he still pops in
Star Wars Vs Star Trek in 5 minutes
heh a sath against a star destroyer would be a good match up. i keep telling my friend the sath would own even though a star destroyer has shields

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill