[Grug]

lol omg.

Ahh...
Well I think a disclaimer on some threads would be appropriate or a new Terms and Conditions clause for members.
Something along the lines of acknowledging that while the majority of people in the forums are mature they will make poor effort in showing it. Members should also take heed that more than often sadistic and poor taste in humour is often displayed for the viewing of others, but you may reply with similar distaste for vengence.

Something like that anyways...

[Taristin]

Originally posted by Sandwich
Quit the freaking christian bashing, guys!!! Or I'll ban every single one of you!!!!!!!!

Um... you're not above the ''read before you open yer' mouth'' rule... It was obviously a satire. And I hope you do ban all of us. Then you can sit here alone and wallow in it.

[Bobboau]

...christions suck...

[Taristin]

The Ions of christ have gravity?

[Kamikaze]

Raa: I'm pretty sure he was being funny/sarcastic too.

[Taristin]

Eh? That's not the typical way Sarnie tries to make hunour...  Except for the multiple exclamation points.

Either way. I feel like defying authority tonight, and I really don't know why.

[Knight Templar]

Troll.

[mitac]

Sarcasm? What's that?

BTW, I forgot to mention that nuking Never Neverland back to the stone age might also be an option.

[Windrunner]

nah, tagging would never work, monkey banning is mutch easier.

[mitac]

He's got a point there.

[WMCoolmon]

I think it'd be a lot better to make a 'Debate Floor' forum for all political/economics/religion discussion. I've seen this on another forum and it works pretty well, since only the people who want to discuss the issues ever see the threads on them. To reduce clutter on the main page, it could even be a subforum of Hard Light.

The only problem I see is finding someone to moderate it.

[Fineus]

I think we'd rather everyone just avoided being such complete asses, rather than trying to find new and inventive ways for them to discuss the same things. I for one have no problem with political threads and what have you - if people want to discuss that then that's fine by me.

What's getting on my nerves is that certain members don't know where to draw the line... when to shut up. As has already been said - banning is a much easier option. Less hassle for us and instantly effective.

It's also fun

[Flipside]

Shrike, he can just use a bot to lock every thread at a random number of posts, I wonder how long it'd take before people figured it out

[Taristin]

Heh. I would (mod it), but I don't think the administration would like it much... (I'd be fair! I pwomise!)

[TopAce]

Originally posted by WMCoolmon
...
The only problem I see is finding someone to moderate it.

Admins regularly check the Hard Light forum and close threads when necessary. Finding moderators would not be a problem.

[Setekh]

Originally posted by Sandwich
Quit the freaking christian bashing, guys!!! Or I'll ban every single one of you!!!!!!!!

Am I the only one who realised he was kidding?

With regard to the topic, I second Kal.

[Kosh]

Liberator in particular feeling under pressure because of some of his views,

If Liberator would not frequently make personal attacks against everybody who disagrees with him, then perhaps he would have some sympathy. As it stands right now, I doubt it.

I think he is getting exactly what he deserves.

[Sandwich]

Originally posted by Setekh
Am I the only one who realised he was kidding?

Apparently. I guess that's the last time I hope people will understand me without the use of smilies.

[Flipside]

Heh, you could at least have replaced some of the '!'s with '1's, I'd have probably got the message then

[Sandwich]

You know, I completely forgot about that.