Originally posted by an0n
The Polish didn't win the war either. They lost, the government legged it and the Allies wiped the floor with the Germans.
Fair enough, that's one point of view.

Lost battles/wars are what happens when you are situated in Central Europe - politically the WORST place to be (well, maybe Israel can compete here... but we're talking about 1939).
Polish army - unprepared, poorly equipped and mobilized too late (in order "not to provoke Hitler") put up one hell of a fight, to be honest. The fact is, REGULAR army units fought to early 1940 using guerilla tactics. Then the "real" guerilla forces - AK, AL, GL and a couple of other formations - became a real pain in the ass for Germany.
Here are the most accurate loss statistics known to date:
Men:Poland - ca. 200.000 (killed AND wounded)
Germany - 16343 killed, 27280 wounded, 320 missing
Armor:Poland - 755
Germany - 993
Other vehicles:Poland - ?
Germany - 11.000
Aircraft:Poland - 300
Germany - 564
Artillery:Poland - ?
Germany - 370
Firearms:Poland - ?
Germany - 14620
You can safely assume that "?" means "excessive losses, probably close to 100%, because they were captured". Germans used much of the captured equipment later in the war (AT weaponry comes to mind).
Yes, Polish army was outnumbered, outclassed, unprepared (most of the units weren't on their designated positions on September 1st), chaotically commanded (no one expected the Blitzkrieg and Polish units lacked mobility). And I'm not trying to find an "excuse", just trying to show that the Polish September wasn't a "cakewalk" that Hitler planned it to be.
Just look at the losses again and then think WHY Hitler wasn't able to invade France straight away, in 1939. The fact that the Western Allies learned NOTHING from the September Campaign is another story.