Author Topic: Possible Spaceballs sequel? (Read 1490 times)

Turnsky · **on:** January 22, 2005, 09:22:57 pm

http://www.darkhorizons.com/news04/040928a.php

Discuss

Bobboau · **Reply #1 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:23:44 pm

I'm still waiting for history of the world part 2, the jews in space looked awsome

an0n · **Reply #2 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:24:48 pm

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Ford Prefect · **Reply #3 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:27:43 pm

Mel Brooks must be defeated before he is allowed to unleash any more of his monstrosities of mediocrity against this poor, defenseless world.

Rictor · **Reply #4 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:27:48 pm

Woot!

Too bad John Candy isn't around to act in it though.

Turnsky · **Reply #5 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:34:08 pm

Quote

Originally posted by Ford Prefect
Mel Brooks must be defeated before he is allowed to unleash any more of his monstrosities of mediocrity against this poor, defenseless world.

no, that's george lucas.

and you obviously don't have any sense of humor outside snuff films, either, it seems.

neo_hermes · **Reply #6 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:35:50 pm

Ah, now i'm goin to watch Spaceballs and History of the World part 1 now.

Ford Prefect · **Reply #7 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:40:11 pm

The humor of Mel Brooks's movies is forced, obvious, often corny, and consistently stupid. Spaceballs was the only one that even gave me an occasional chuckle, and that was only the first time I watched it.

Humor must be allowed to speak for itself. Mel Brooks couldn't leave his own jokes alone.

Grey Wolf · **Reply #8 on:** January 22, 2005, 09:52:20 pm

I preferred the earlier ones, such as Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein. The humour goes downhill from there...

Bobboau · **Reply #9 on:** January 22, 2005, 10:44:19 pm

the 'jokes' are so forced there funny, like when you see something so horable it's funny, like that suicide bomber car comercal, or "while you were busy castrating a priceless antique, I was systematicly feeding babies... to mutated puppies!!!"

Corsair · **Reply #10 on:** January 22, 2005, 10:48:56 pm

That's why they're funny...

Ford Prefect · **Reply #11 on:** January 22, 2005, 11:02:16 pm

Mel Brooks movies aren't nearly that offensive. If they were, they would probably be funnier.

And it never looks to me like the forced aspect of the humor is intentional. It just looks like it's trying too hard.

Night Hammer · **Reply #12 on:** January 22, 2005, 11:59:31 pm

they are really politically incorrect....i love em

Flipside · **Reply #13 on:** January 23, 2005, 06:02:51 am

That's down to the acting, not the writing, take, for example, how smoothly Rick Moranis carried off Dark Helmet, compared to some of the more 'pantomime' acting from other people in Spaceballs.

It could be good, but it probably won't admittedly

Ashrak · **Reply #14 on:** January 23, 2005, 06:14:10 am

what was the sequel gonna be called?

the search for more money? i think heheh

Flipside · **Reply #15 on:** January 23, 2005, 06:16:17 am

hehehe Yep, or, in a more Mel Brooks voice..

'Da Soich for more Money'

It would only be good if Rick Moranis and the old crew are still interested, unless he intend to get an entirely new crew in and use that to take the piss out of George even more

Moiraine Sedai · **Reply #16 on:** January 23, 2005, 11:24:19 am

Quote

Possible Spaceballs sequel?

I'd just like to add my vote to the 'I do so hope not'. With the exception of the Leia hair/headphones gag, the film was rather poor.

What ever happen to those days of making bad sequels to good films?

aldo_14 · **Reply #17 on:** January 23, 2005, 01:36:57 pm

It's changed to making bad remakes of good films, i think.

Oh, and apparently they're now remaking the Fly (again)

Overlord · **Reply #18 on:** January 23, 2005, 02:22:36 pm

W00t, i love Spaceballs.

Liberator · **Reply #19 on:** January 23, 2005, 05:56:49 pm

Quote

Originally posted by aldo_14
It's changed to making bad remakes of good films, i think.

Oh, and apparently they're now remaking the Fly (again)

That'd be #3 right? Or is it #4?

News: