Author Topic: the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!  (Read 2651 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Quote
Originally posted by Tiara

I've seen a ducumentary on this same subject on the Discovery channel. They showed in very good detail that both styles had advantages and disadvantages. They even showed 3-D fights to show what they meant. It's *impossible* to say that one is better then the other.


And that was exactly his concusion! Read the whole text before bearing judgment.

The guy knows everything there is to know about middle age weaponry, armor and fighting technuiques. He trained with those weapons, he carried the armors and read the training manuals. True, the Europian region (thus, knights) is his favorite, but he's not attacking japanese or samurais.

In the end, his conclusion is htat both are elite, extreemly capable fighters.

Don't allso forget that what he is discussing is hypothetical. He states the probabiltiy of things (such as the samurai intimidated by hte bigger and bulkier europeian - which is completely palusable, as it is logical to fear somone who is stronger and bigger more, but as he himself states it later in the text - probably irelevant with all things considered).

Allso, he is not switching the weapons becoause he's trying to give the knight an advantage, but becouse he's trying t portrait different scenarios, as fighting techniques differ significantly wiht each weapon.

I would prolly put my money on the knight (sword&shield or greatsword), but then again, like the man said - it differ greatly given the time period and equipment.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
In open ground wouldn't a Knight use his horse in combination with a pole weapon instead of a sword to kill an oponent?
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
And the samurai would probably shoot an arrow through the slit in his helm when he was charging at him...
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline Nico

  • Venom
    Parlez-vous Model Magician?
  • 212
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
So would the samurai. Then, even before, he'd use his bow. But heh, the guy decided "no ranged weapons", so there goes the samurai's weapon of choice :rolleyes:
SCREW CANON!

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Logistically, an open field, a knight in his armour vs. any type of Samurai that has any kenjutsu knowledge =

One supremely dead Knight after about 1-3 minutes.

Note: You can't ****ing MOVE in that armor, no matter how strong you are. The agility of man is significantly decreased when you wear all that medieval crap. That's why the Samurai clothing is made of not only layers, but also parts that don't contain the armor in order for them to be able to move.

Fact.

I'm not even getting into how many times a Katana is better than Valiant type of swords.

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
He put them on open ground a few feet away from eachother to give them both equal starting conditions.

He did say the combantans COULD use horses or ranged weapons, but for this faceoff it would be best if tehy fought melee.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Samurai bows weren't anything impressive - it took longbows to get through heavy plate at any useful range. The knight's heavy armour and shield would probably shrug off the arrows at range, and if you're going to allow all weapons, the samurai is screwed once the mounted knight starts a galloping charge from medium range and sticks a heavy lance on him before he can draw, aim and fire another arrow.

In all reality, the guy's assertion is mostly valid - they're fairly equivalent opponents, each with his own strengths and weaknesses, and the battle would most probably be decided by  unpredictable circumstances.

But knights are still cooler. :D
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Quote
Originally posted by TrashMan


And that was exactly his concusion! Read the whole text before bearing judgment.

The guy knows everything there is to know about middle age weaponry, armor and fighting technuiques. He trained with those weapons, he carried the armors and read the training manuals. True, the Europian region (thus, knights) is his favorite, but he's not attacking japanese or samurais.

In the end, his conclusion is htat both are elite, extreemly capable fighters.

Don't allso forget that what he is discussing is hypothetical. He states the probabiltiy of things (such as the samurai intimidated by hte bigger and bulkier europeian - which is completely palusable, as it is logical to fear somone who is stronger and bigger more, but as he himself states it later in the text - probably irelevant with all things considered).

Allso, he is not switching the weapons becoause he's trying to give the knight an advantage, but becouse he's trying t portrait different scenarios, as fighting techniques differ significantly wiht each weapon.

I would prolly put my money on the knight (sword&shield or greatsword), but then again, like the man said - it differ greatly given the time period and equipment.

That's not my point. the fact that the guy actually wrote an article on this subject shows he's not all that bright in the first place.

First he sets parameters that effectively make the entire debate invalid. Then follow various arguments which are inherently flawed.

Not to mention that I found some historical flaws as well. Another point that really makes it harder for me to take the article serious.

To quote someone I know;

"If he's so smart, he wouldn't be so stupid."

I really don't care if he's an expert. If he didn't contrdict himself and put false historical information in his article, it would be far more believable.

His conclusions might be correct, but conclusions are the least important. It's like saying x+1/y = 9 . Why is the answer 9? Give proper reasoning.

Since we're nearing exam time around here, if he gave me this as one of the final essays, the guy would get maybe a 6.5 (on a scale of 10) for not doing proper research. Which is a serious issue in any article and/or essay since it's directly related to the manner of which the reader perceives the information given to him/her.
 
[/teachermode]

ARRR MATEY! *CHOPPERCHOPCHOPCHOPCHOP*

:p
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
'During the Sengokujidai, the Japanese Samurai developed new armor and tactics more rapidly
than at any other time (Cleary 42). The most important factor in the development of tactics was
the introduction of firearms from Europe in 1542. Stephen Turnbull said in his book Samurai
Warfare, "The usual conclusion is to see the introduction of firearms as the cause, and the
change in warfare as the result." The Daimyo could no longer use the cavalry charge, which was
the most successful tactic until firearms. Because of the destructive nature of firearms, if a
Daimyo didn't get his hands on as many as possible, he would lose. However, most Daimyo didn't
like guns because they lessened the importance of honorable hand-to-hand fighting that had gone
on for centuries.

   Firearms also brought about changes in the Samurai's armor, and even the recruitment of non
Samurai to fight in battle. Armor now had to be thicker and heavier for the upper class
Samurai; yet, even this was not enough. This extra cost, in money and life, was offset by the
Daimyo recruiting commoners to fight their battles. These commoners were called "ashigaru", or
light feet. Ashigaru, too, were against the Samurai idea of honor. Their widespread and
sometimes uncontrolled use contradicted much of the Samurai ideal of elite combat, but large
numbers had to be used by any successful leader (Turnbull Warfare 49). Thus began the
Sengokujidai, an age of war, greed, and treachery.'


Hmmmm... Pistols might have something to say about that plate armour though ;)

Smauri actually preferred cavalry charges as much as Medieval Knights did, but while Europe was slow to adopt Pistolletes, Japan was much faster to see the advantage ;)
« Last Edit: February 04, 2005, 04:49:20 pm by 394 »

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Note to the Reader: Though I run an organization and website dedicated to historical European swordplay and fighting arts, I appreciate all swords of the world and consider each separately as a tool within their own cultural and martial context. So, I'm often perturbed at the prejudice and ignorance that results from the influential popular media in regard to many of them, particularly the hype that surrounds Japanese swords. For what's its worth, I offer my opinion here in the most even-handed and objective manner possible for me given my considerable experience and familiarity with historical European arms and armor and authentic Medieval & Renaissance combatives. As well, being a former member of the Houston Token Kai, (Japanese sword appreciation society) and having had the privilege of knowing several collectors, museum curators, and a blade polisher, I've had the opportunity over the last decade to handle more than a hundred genuine Japanese swords, ranging from mid-13th to early-20th century pieces. I've even had the rare pleasure to briefly wield several in floryshing and practice. I've also handled and personally examined in museums and private collections more than 200 antique European swords of all types from bronze-age to 19th century specimens as well as numerous ones from the Middle East, Africa, the Pacific Rim, and Central Asia. In addition to the hundred or so different sword forms--both European and Asian, antique and modern--that I've test-cut with against a wide assortment of materials, I've also cut with numerous Japanese swords (in this case, early-20th century specimens and modern reproductions) as well as attended several test-cutting demonstrations. Combined with my two and a half decades of fencing study with Medieval and Renaissance swords, and years of teaching them, I therefore feel uniquely qualified as a full-time practitioner to write this piece. Sadly, it's all too common to encounter individuals who feel appreciation of one culture's fighting arts must to come at denigration of another. Such adolescent reactions are a reflection of the reader's insecurity and immaturity. While we welcome intelligent discussion, before sending us any rebuttal email on this piece (or its companion article) we request you consider this as well as read through the entire article first. Additionally, please, do not waste our time and yours by emailing embarrassingly juvenile claims about how samurai "would have just used their Ki" or "everyone knows katanas could cut through any other swords" or that "Medieval armor was super heavy and clumsy." It should be abundantly clear that we deal here in physical reality and verifiable historical facts not fantasy derived from some video game or anime. Thank you.

From the guys own pen...

@tiara - I read trough the guys articel twice.. I found nothing wrong in it...
« Last Edit: February 04, 2005, 05:03:52 pm by 624 »
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Yeah... Meanwhile, your pistol armed samurais wouldn't be facing knights, but formations of musketeers supported by pikemen, which would slaughter them without much trouble. ;)
Probably away. Contact through email.

  

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Quote
Originally posted by TrashMan
From the guys own pen...


I find it hard to trust the opinions of someone who doesn't understand what a paragraph is :lol:
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
LOL Actually, considering Samauri used Pistol Ashigaru to a very large degree but that stage, chances are anyone on a horse would look like a collander within the first 15 minutes of combat ;)

I can actually find precious little info on the Samauri Bow, the Internet seems obsessed with the Katana, it wasn't very powerful (it was a horse bow), but they were pretty good shots, either way, it's still tough to call, the Two are extremely similar in both their techniques and their Honour system.

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Trashman, I have a master's degree in history. I think I know what I'm talking about when I see historical flaws. I'm not saying he is wrong, since I agree with his final conclusion. I'm just saying that his whole article is quite flawed. His argumentative structure and reasoning leave a lot to be desired.

I'm also not questioning his knowledge about the various weapons involved, but that seems to be all he really knows for some reason.

Quote
About the Author:
Having pursued the craft since 1980, John Clements is one of the world's foremost authorities on Medieval and Renaissance fighting skills. Clements has authored two books and more than a dozen magazine articles on historical swordplay. A leader in historical fencing studies, he has researched swords and sword combat in ten countries and taught seminars on the subject in eight. He has lectured and demonstrated at numerous museums and universities and is a frequent consultant on Medieval and Renaissance combative systems. He works full-time teaching and writing on historical European fighting arts.

He seems to have limit himself to the martial arts himself and little of the actual historical background. hHe might know a lot more about medieval fighting skills and weapons then me, but he certainly does not know how to write an article up to decent standards. If my assignment during my final year would be to write an article on this subject and i would turn this in, i wouldn't pass for sure.

I'm not bashing the guy, it was a very decent article for the average reader, but it wasn't a very well done one for me. (granted I nit-pick A LOT lately :p)

*goes back to grading another 31 4-page papers*

I wish I had some machine to grade the papers for me. Reading 31 papers on the same subject is boring as hell :sigh:
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
His writing skills seem to be enough for what he does...books, seminars, one of hte leading authorities on his field... I'd say hes doing good.

I really don't see any logical flaw here or places where he contradicted hismelf in that article.. So he doesn't have a masters degree in literature? So what?

By your standards, 90% of todays most beloved authors should have never finished school. But that's not even the point.

The whole point of this thread (and the reason I posted it) is to show how wrong current media present thing and blown up some things can be.

I find this thing hillarious:
Additionally, please, do not waste our time and yours by emailing embarrassingly juvenile claims about how samurai "would have just used their Ki" or "everyone knows katanas could cut through any other swords" or that "Medieval armor was super heavy and clumsy." It should be abundantly clear that we deal here in physical reality and verifiable historical facts not fantasy derived from some video game or anime. Thank you.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Grey Wolf

the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
I remember hearing somewhere that in combat, using his katana was actually one of the samurai's last resorts. The favored weapons were the bow and the naginata, assuming I remember it correctly, and a naginata should basically be the equivalent of a Western halberd.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Quote
Originally posted by TrashMan
His writing skills seem to be enough for what he does...books, seminars, one of hte leading authorities on his field... I'd say hes doing good.

I never said he was doing a bad job. Hell, i even said it was a very decent article for the average reader. but for him being one of the LEADING authorities in his field of study, it really makes me wonder.

Quote
I really don't see any logical flaw here or places where he contradicted hismelf in that article.. So he doesn't have a masters degree in literature? So what?

As I said, i'm nitpickerish about stuff like this. People see him as some uber-expert but yet they don't seem to see the difference between a equally uber article and an average one.

As for the flawed argumentative structure, reasoning and self-contradiction, i really don't have time to grade this article as well next to my stack of essays from my own students. :p

Quote
By your standards, 90% of todays most beloved authors should have never finished school. But that's not even the point.

No, they would've graduated high school :p Just not with real good grades for their essays if they use misinformation. A 6.5 (as i would give this article) would roughly be a C or C- in American grades. Which is just enough to graduate IIRC (unless the US eduction system is that much different from ours). :p:D

Quote
The whole point of this thread (and the reason I posted it) is to show how wrong current media present thing and blown up some things can be.

My point is that people shouldn't accept this article (or any other article really) so readily just because it looks good on the surface. You should be weary of such articles because the (background) information and underlying 'facts' in such articles is easily absorbed and seen as the truth.

This is actually a very dangerous way of spreading misinformation.
Quote
I find this thing hillarious:
Additionally, please, do not waste our time and yours by emailing embarrassingly juvenile claims about how samurai "would have just used their Ki" or "everyone knows katanas could cut through any other swords" or that "Medieval armor was super heavy and clumsy." It should be abundantly clear that we deal here in physical reality and verifiable historical facts not fantasy derived from some video game or anime. Thank you.

Hehe :D
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Early Samurai were very strict in their code, they only fought other Samurai and they only fought with Two ceremonial swords. They were the only warriors in Japan allowed to carry 2 swords, in fact.

A lot of that changed with the creation of the Shogun and the Feudal system he imposed, suddenly wars sprang up between Nobles, and groups of Samurai would write into battle against each other. This was the high Era of the Samurai, they used Bows from a Distance, and then reverted to swords afterwards.

As the wars grew, the Ashigaru or 'lower warriors' were born, ordinary peasants with naginata, who, when grouped together were very effective against even groups of Samurai. It was at this stage that they started to adopt the bow more and more frequently as their weapon of choice.

Remember, Samurai bows were not to heavy foot-fired affairs of the Chinese army, there were never enough Samurai to provide a 'rain of Arrows', so they prided themselves on accuracy and being able to find chinks and gaps in their opponents armour.

Personally, I'm not making a guess who would win either way, it could just be the wording, but it seems to me with this article, no matter how right or wrong he may be, the author set out with a conclusion and then wrote an essay to prove it ;)

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
I choose to trust the words of an expert, rather then holywood or some self proclaimed know-it-alls who bough a sword replica on EBay and now thinks he knows everything...

I don't belive everything I see or read - in fact, I practicly don't belive anything I hear or see and view everything with skepticism.

Freedom of speech is a two edge blade and it seems to me the wielder is getting cut way too often (when any idiot can say whatever they want)

@Flipside:
Personally, I'm not making a guess who would win either way, it could just be the wording, but it seems to me with this article, no matter how right or wrong he may be, the author set out with a conclusion and then wrote an essay to prove it.

Eh? His only conclusion is that one cannot deterime who would win in such generalized arguments (too many variables), and that in the end it would mostly come down to personal skill & luck.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
the truth about Knights and Samurais!!!
Sorry, badly worded that,  I meant it's too easy to pick a conclusion and then right an essay to prove it, it doesn't matter if the Author is right or wrong, I'm sure I could find 100 articles saying that a Samurai would win and another 100 saying Knights would win, all stating 'reputable' sources.

What I meant was that suits of Armour could stay in the family for 100 years, poorer nobles had cheaper, older and less flexible armour etc. The same with poorer Samurai families, etc, so he is 100% right about too many variables.