Author Topic: Boooo, hissss  (Read 1025 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/sim/x3reunion/preview_6134315.html

Quote
With X3: Reunion, Egosoft is overhauling its open-ended space exploration, trading, and combat game with a brand-new 3D graphics engine, as well as a single-player plot. X3 should be the most user-friendly X game yet, because it's being designed to work on both the PC and the Xbox. That's good news for gamers, as the previous X games were huge, open-ended affairs that suffered from dauntingly steep learning curves. Of course, it doesn't hurt that X3 also features a jaw-dropping graphics engine that makes the final frontier look prettier than ever. With X3 in the final stages of development, Egosoft's Greg Kingston and Mark "Toastie" Wilson explain in this edition of our designer diaries the workings of the ongoing beta test. X3 is scheduled to ship next month.


Why consoles? why!??! Must they ruin/cripple such a potentially great game by sacrificing features for compatibility on consoles? Ive been awaiting this game for nearly a year and after I hear things like that its killing my excitement. Your thoughts?
« Last Edit: September 27, 2005, 12:52:27 pm by 2010 »

 

Offline Styxx

  • 211
    • Hard Light Productions
Because the last X game was PC only and sold miserably?
Probably away. Contact through email.

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
Because the game market is in consoles these days? Even more so because the next generation consoles are being hyped so much. I expect PC gaming market to become even smaller in the coming years. That said, I dislike consoles.

 
IMO it diddnt sell well because it wasnt marketed properly in the USA , kind of like freespace 2

 

Offline Japong

  • 25
    • http://www.underthreat.tk
Yeah... all the fun of having gamepad-oriented menus that don't ****ing work with the mouse.  I've yet to see a PC release that hasn't suffered when it becomes cross-platform.  We'll see how this fares.
www.underthreat.tk
Yeah, it's my comic.

 

Offline Fragrag

  • 26
Whoa, Deus Ex: Invisible War déja vu
"On this day...my pants are filled....with joy" -Singh, doing the pants game
My blog, with 'gorillarape' in the url, who wouldn't visit it?!

 

Offline ZylonBane

  • The Infamous
  • 29
And here silly me thought "X3: Reunion" was the title of the next X-Men movie.
ZylonBane's opinions do not represent those of the management.

 

Offline Grey Wolf

KotOR wasn't bad in the controls department. Of course, it was a CRPG.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Japong

  • 25
    • http://www.underthreat.tk
KotOR had decent controls, but the levels were incredibly limited in scope  - it felt very similar to Invisible War in that regard.  It was a huge step backwards from Baldur's Gate 2, which had sprawling cities that you could explore for hours, yet it still felt just as polished.
www.underthreat.tk
Yeah, it's my comic.

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
I'd have serious worries about the dumbification of the game for porting.  On the other hand, their marketing department must be wetting themselves at the X-X name tie in.

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
Quote
Originally posted by MatthewPapa
IMO it diddnt sell well because it wasnt marketed properly in the USA , kind of like freespace 2


I suppose "It really sucked" wasn't enough to make it sell poorly?
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]

 
Part of me wants to bemoan yet another PC title undergoing a console neutering.

On the other hand, I actually played X2, and well, it's hard to get upset about that.  A very interesting econo sim with a third rate space flight sim attached ain't my idea of grand.

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Fragrag
Whoa, Deus Ex: Invisible War déja vu



No kidding....
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
Was I the only one that liked Deus Ex: Invisible War?
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Probably.

i think I saw that for a fiver the other day.

 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
I overall liked it too (better than 90% of modern FPS games IMO), but it was nonetheless a huge letdown compared to what it could have been. If they had gotten everything perfect, it could potentially have been one of the best games of all time, but it ended up being merely a pretty good game.

One of the really annoying problems was the insanely sluggish graphics engine. I don't think I have seen anything that bad for many years. Makes you wonder what the hell they did to the Unreal Warfare engine that normally runs so nicely.

 

Offline ZylonBane

  • The Infamous
  • 29
The problem with Invisible War was that pretty much everything it did, the original Deus Ex did better. DX had bigger maps, more maps, more detailed damage modelling, more extensive weapon upgrading, better weapon implementation (aiming reticle, multiple ammo types, reloading), more detailed data vault, more detailed hacking (passwords, timeout zapping), more inventory slots, more aug types, more memorable characters, an experience system, better management of load zones, a less intrusive HUD, leaning, swimming, a control scheme designed around mouse+keyboard instead of a gamepad, and better graphics and physics.

Yeah, that's right-- better graphics and physics.

Graphics: Sure IW had higher polygon counts and neato shader effects, but the razor-edged dynamic shadows look like crap compared to soft-edged static shadows, the texture compression makes even high-res textures look distorted, the X-Box RAM limited them to a small variety of textures, they lost basic rendering features like damage decals, detail textures, cloud decks, and mirrors, and frankly the art direction and character design suck.

Physics: With the Havok physics engine, IW should have had superior physics, but they used it so badly that the end result is laughable. You can toss a body ten feet in the air, then shoot it straight up until it disappears from sight. You can accidently send a barrel flying across the room by bumping into it. DX's physics may have been primitive, but at least they weren't so obviously wrong.

Some of IW's problems can be blamed on the X-Box, but the sad truth is that a lot of its problems were fundamental design decisions-- like the meaningless faction system, cartoonish physics, or the whole "I can do whatever I want without meaningful consequence... therefore nothing I do matters" narrative structure.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 11:59:59 am by 264 »
ZylonBane's opinions do not represent those of the management.

 

Offline mikhael

  • Back to skool
  • 211
  • Fnord!
    • http://www.google.com/search?q=404error.com
I don't know what it looked like on the XBox, but it looked much better than the original on my PC. I can't disagree with the rest of your points though.

But I still really liked the game. I'm biased though.
[I am not really here. This post is entirely a figment of your imagination.]