Author Topic: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??  (Read 2090 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Scuddie

  • gb2/b/
  • 28
  • I will never leave.
Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Between having used IE (maxthon shell), Firefox, and Opera, I am quite fed up with all the different browsers.  It seems not one of them works!  My problem with IE was only becoming noticeable recently, but it's fairly obvious what it is...  Stability and security.  This browser is no longer for me.  My problem with Firefox is that the multi-windowing system absolutely sucks, and ActiveX is disabled.  It is because of this why I have always hated it with a passion.  I want a web browser, not a nuisance.  Opera is everything Firefox should have been, but XML, ActiveX, and Java controls do not work for me correctly, ever.  It seems more like a fool's implementation of it.

So with that said, does a good browser actually exist?  What I would like in a browser is the always-working compiling and displaying of IE, the security of Firefox, and the multisession options of Opera.  I am just a tad tired of having three browsers instaslled on my PC.  It is pissing me off, and rightly so.  I just want one.  ONE!  I wouldn't mind, for once, using a browser that wasn't programmed by a group of incompetant imbeciles...
Bunny stole my signature :(.

Sorry boobies.

 

Offline pyro-manic

  • Flambé
  • 210
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Not to sound harsh, but either you're incredibly, unrealistically picky, or something's broken. Firefox works very well - and how does the multi-windowing system suck? What does it do (or not) that you don't like?

I only used Opera briefly, before the adverts annoyed me too much, but again, it worked perfectly well.

You know FF is open-source, right? So if you're that pissed at the peeps who write it, you can always fix it yourself...
Any fool can pull a trigger...

 

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Are you seriously suggesting the Firefox and Opera developers include the single most insecure component of IE into their browsers? It's a good thing ActiveX doesn't work.

BTW: If you really must have ActiveX, there is an extension for Firefox that lets you use the IE engine instead of Gecko. Do some research before *****ing. :rolleyes:

pyro: Since version 8.5 all the adverts have been removed from Opera.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2005, 04:38:02 pm by Kamikaze »
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman

 

Offline Nix

  • 28
  • In the morning!
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
I think this arguement would be much more justified on the Pocket PC platform.  Pocket IE is completely useless, Netfront 3 doesnt display things exactly the way I want them, ever, and Minimo is way too slow, still in development.  Pocket IE has a hack to make it function similar to IE6, but then the pages are rendered without any sort of formatting for the PPC, in other words, it's huge, and you have to scroll all over the place just to read the webpage.  I'm curious though, why would you absolutely NEED ActiveX? 


 

Offline CP5670

  • Dr. Evil
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Yeah, I consider it a very good thing that FF does not run ActiveX scripts.

 

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
I'm curious though, why would you absolutely NEED ActiveX? 

It's probably because Windows update uses ActiveX.
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman

 

Offline WMCoolmon

  • Purveyor of space crack
  • 213
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Use Firefox for everything, until you get to a site that needs ActiveX.
-C

 

Offline Nix

  • 28
  • In the morning!
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
OHH right! I guess though I'm used to doing what we do at work, we get the updates seperately and install them seperately.  It's our way of avoiding IE as much as possible.

 

Offline SGGWD

  • 24
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Try Dr. Orca http://forum.avantbrowser.com/viewtopic.php?t=12628, still in beta stage but an excellent combination between the features of Avant Browser and Gecko (Firefox) engine.

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Between having used IE (maxthon shell), Firefox, and Opera, I am quite fed up with all the different browsers. It seems not one of them works! My problem with IE was only becoming noticeable recently, but it's fairly obvious what it is... Stability and security. This browser is no longer for me. My problem with Firefox is that the multi-windowing system absolutely sucks, and ActiveX is disabled. It is because of this why I have always hated it with a passion. I want a web browser, not a nuisance. Opera is everything Firefox should have been, but XML, ActiveX, and Java controls do not work for me correctly, ever. It seems more like a fool's implementation of it.

So with that said, does a good browser actually exist? What I would like in a browser is the always-working compiling and displaying of IE, the security of Firefox, and the multisession options of Opera. I am just a tad tired of having three browsers instaslled on my PC. It is pissing me off, and rightly so. I just want one. ONE! I wouldn't mind, for once, using a browser that wasn't programmed by a group of incompetant imbeciles...
Basically what you're asking for does not exist.  And I think your splitting hairs.

What multi-windowing system in Firefox?  What sucks?  It operates like every other browser out there when it comes to handling windows and tabs.

Personally I'm a huge fan of Firefox.  It does everything I want it to do, not having ActiveX is a good thing (this is the buggiest piece of security ridden crap ever and its one of the primary causes for IE's problems), it has full support of W3C standards (IE does not), and its very simple.

What you may want to try, and I don't know if this will work, and I don't know if you can get past the "multi windowing" problem but there is a Firefox plugin called "IE View" which lets you view webpages as IE would view them if you want to.

You can of course wait for IE7.0 and see what that brings to us.  The best version of it won't be available for Windows XP mind you but that is heavily dependant on the security system built into Windows Vista so I can sort of see why.  But honestly, I think Firefox is the best option for the vast majority of people out there...count your blessings that nobody use uses ActiveX and be happy.  And if its missing something, look for one of the various plugins.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Scuddie

  • gb2/b/
  • 28
  • I will never leave.
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Nobody uses ActiveX?  How about Flash (which sucks as a plugin), Trend Micro Housecall, Comcast tech support, some of DSLR tools...  The list goes on and on.

As for the windowing system in firefox, it's the fact that no matter what configuration you set, it is still going to treat new windows as new instances of Firefox.  Maxthon doesn't do that, nor does Opera.  Firefox on the other hand has a notorious habbit of opening a brand new Firefox instance whenever there is target=_blank present.  Launched browser windows from external applications also always opens a new instance of firefox, instead of a new tab.  Tabs are also not-so-easy to close.  Like I said, this is completely regardless of configuration.
Bunny stole my signature :(.

Sorry boobies.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
As for the windowing system in firefox, it's the fact that no matter what configuration you set, it is still going to treat new windows as new instances of Firefox.  Maxthon doesn't do that, nor does Opera.  Firefox on the other hand has a notorious habbit of opening a brand new Firefox instance whenever there is target=_blank present.  Launched browser windows from external applications also always opens a new instance of firefox, instead of a new tab.  Tabs are also not-so-easy to close.  Like I said, this is completely regardless of configuration.
Not true in the least.  It sounds like you've never heard of Tabbrowser Preferences, which is practically required downloading for Firefox users.  It adds a lot of useful tabbed browsing options into the Preferences interface.  Every link I click on with a target redirect opens in a new tab in the background.  Closing a tab is as easy as middle-clicking on it; in fact, I thought that was a default feature of Firefox.  You might be right about opening links from external applications, but Tabbrowser Preferences might cover that as well, and if it doesn't I'm sure another extension does.  (Speaking of which, after checking out the extensions page, I've heard about a new extension called Tab Mix Plus that sounds like it may be even better than TBP; I'll have to look into it.)  A little research before venting goes a long way.

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
:wtf:
Nobody uses ActiveX?  How about Flash (which sucks as a plugin), Trend Micro Housecall, Comcast tech support, some of DSLR tools...  The list goes on and on.


Flash does not suck as a plugin. It does not need ActiveX. It installs itself for both IE and FF quite happily.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Scuddie

  • gb2/b/
  • 28
  • I will never leave.
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Sorry Vyper, but you are wrong.  Flash installs an ActiveX control for IE, not the plugin.  There are many sites I am forced to use IE because of the fact that embedded form data doesn't work right as a plugin.

Mongoose, thanks for the link. I'll try it out.
Bunny stole my signature :(.

Sorry boobies.

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Sorry Vyper, but you are wrong.  Flash installs an ActiveX control for IE, not the plugin.  There are many sites I am forced to use IE because of the fact that embedded form data doesn't work right as a plugin.

Mongoose, thanks for the link. I'll try it out.

Yes it may very well install as that in IE, but it doesn't NEED to be that. Go on, give me an example where it's a problem to use flash and FF.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Scuddie

  • gb2/b/
  • 28
  • I will never leave.
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Embedded form data.
Bunny stole my signature :(.

Sorry boobies.

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
And who in God's name is using flash for form data?  That's such a waste of, well, everything that it's not funny.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline vyper

  • 210
  • The Sexy Scotsman
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
Embedded form data.

I noticed you already said that, I meant an actual instance where it didn't work.
"But you live, you learn.  Unless you die.  Then you're ****ed." - aldo14

 

Offline Grey Wolf

Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
* Grey Wolf vouches for Mozilla Suite 1.7.12
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Kamikaze

  • A Complacent Wind
  • 29
    • http://www.nodewar.com
Re: Ugh... Is there not one browser that works??
The ActiveX issue doesn't matter as there's an extension that lets FF use the IE engine. Do people not read posts anymore? :p

Quote
Launched browser windows from external applications also always opens a new instance of firefox, instead of a new tab.

This is not Firefox's fault. It is either Windows or the other applications. On my box if I have an open Firefox window and type "firefox http://www.slashdot.com" into a terminal it will open slashdot in the open window.
Science alone of all the subjects contains within itself the lesson of the danger of belief in the infallibility of the greatest teachers in the preceding generation . . .Learn from science that you must doubt the experts. As a matter of fact, I can also define science another way: Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman