Author Topic: Casino Royale  (Read 2553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
I liked the hard-core action/fight scenes, they seemed to have taken a page out of the nitty-gritty book that many TV shows are following these days. And, I thought that Craig did a marvelous job as Bond.

However, the movie had more endings than Return of the King for pete's sake, and about 100x more confusing, to boot! And that's just the plot - forget the fact that the centerpiece to the whole movie was a green felt table.

All in all... :ick:

But the direction shows promise. :)
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
I loved it, save for the whole Return of the King vibe with the multiple endings. That vanished though when what was really going on came to focus in the final few sequences.

Overall, it's what a Bond film should be. I'm not too hopeful for the sequel though as I don't think they'll be able to keep it up...
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

  

Offline Ashrak

  • Not Banned
  • 210
    • Imagination Designs
i actually like multiple endings :D


it gives you that aaaaah its over dangit, oh no wait its still going YAY! feeling :)
I hate My signature!

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Absolutely excellent film. :) I wasn't so sure for the first 15 minutes or so, but I really started getting into it after that.  That whole poker game chunk of the movie was very well done.  (I do have to shed a tear over that car, though. :()  It's a very different Bond than I've ever seen before, and I think it's hard to compare this film to any of the previous ones, but I greatly enjoyed it.  I also liked the role that Judi Dench had in this one; just like Bond, M was much more humanized.  Like other people said before, the lack of gadgetry and flashy save-the-world plot really focused things in on Bond's character and how it developed; he was a very different person at the end of things than when he started out.  The actress who played Vesper was terrific too; for a while there, I could have sworn that she would turn out to be Moneypenney.  Overall, I like this breath of fresh air for the franchise, and I can't wait to see where it goes next.

And yes, the torture scene kicked all kinds of ass.  Balls of steel, indeed. :D

Multiple endings?  Da hell? I didn't get that impression at all, and I certainly didn't find it overly confusing; everything got squared away when all was said and done.  The only gripe I had with it was the fact that my bladder was absolutely bursting at that point; all I wanted to do was get out of there and in front of a urinal ASAP. (Damn oversized movie sodas. :p)  I absolutely loved Bond in that final scene, too.

(And, for the record, Return of the King only had "multiple endings" if you never read the story to begin with.  For those of us who did, the way it finally ended was the only way it possibly could have. ;))

 

Offline Col. Fishguts

  • voodoo doll
  • 211
Just saw it, and I must say I'm quite impressed. It felt a bit like "24 - The Movie", which I liked for my part. It's a refreshing departure from the explosions/car chases/tech gadgets wank-fest from which the last 2 Biond movies suffered.
Also, Casino Royale illustrates that a bad guy who's trying to get 120something million $ can be a more thrilling storyline, than the ridiculous evil master plan (tm).

Craig kicks ass, but I was expecting so after seeing "Layer Cake".
"I don't think that people accept the fact that life doesn't make sense. I think it makes people terribly uncomfortable. It seems like religion and myth were invented against that, trying to make sense out of it." - D. Lynch

Visit The Babylon Project, now also with HTL flavour  ¦ GTB Rhea

 

Offline Rictor

  • Murdered by Brazilian Psychopath
  • 29
Layer Cake wasn't that good. It was a poor attempt  to rip off the Guy Ritchie style of film-making. Not terrible, but not great.

Casino Royale, on the other hand, was awesome. This is what Bond should be. Hell, he even looks like Sean Connery in certain scenes (the very last shot especiialy). My only qualm is that there was no Q. Now I understand they're going for less gadgets more gritty, and that's more than fine by me, but Q is an icon of the Bond series, he has to be in the movie even if its in a minimal role.

 

Offline wtf_cl0vvn

  • 27
  • Kiubo.
well, bond series if you talk about the movies.

My dad introduced me to all of the books early on, so im sort of a purist...i dont think many of the movies are good.
but yeah...he did give off the sean connery air often. which is good.

what was this guy's name again?
This book is a mirror. When a monkey looks in, no apostle looks out. -Lichtenberg

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
what was this guy's name again?

Daniel Craig.  He was in Munich, IIRC.
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!